15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

800 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

(354) a. P iets a′. ergens ... P [existential]<br />

b. P niets b′. nergens ... P [negative existential]<br />

c. P alles c′. overal ... P [universal]<br />

The examples in (355) show that the existential pronoun iets alternates with the<br />

R-word. Although judgments are somewhat subtle, it seems that (355a) is<br />

preferably construed as specific, whereas (355b) instead receives a nonspecific<br />

interpretation.<br />

(355) a. Jan wil op iets wachten.<br />

Jan wants for something wait<br />

‘Jan wants to wait for something.’<br />

b. Jan wil ergens op wachten.<br />

Jan wants somewhere for wait<br />

‘Jan wants to wait for something.’<br />

With the negative existential pronouns, R-pronominalization seems to be the<br />

unmarked option. Realizing the pronoun as the complement <strong>of</strong> the preposition<br />

seems to give rise to a “not a single thing” reading.<br />

(356) a. Jan wil op niets wachten.<br />

Jan has for nothing wait<br />

‘Jan doesn’t want to wait for anything.’<br />

b. Jan wil nergens op wachten.<br />

Jan wants nowhere for wait<br />

‘Jan doesn’t want to wait for anything.’<br />

With the universal pronoun, R-pronominalization may also be the unmarked option.<br />

Realizing the pronoun as the complement <strong>of</strong> the preposition seems to give rise to an<br />

emphatic “each <strong>and</strong> every thing” reading.<br />

(357) a. Jan wil op alles wachten.<br />

Jan wants for everything waited<br />

‘Jan wants to wait for everything.’<br />

b. Jan wil overal op wachten.<br />

Jan wants everywhere for wait<br />

‘Jan wants to wait for everything.’<br />

Given that the above observations are rather impressionistic, more research is<br />

needed to establish whether the R-forms are indeed unmarked <strong>and</strong> whether the two<br />

forms indeed exhibit systematic meaning differences <strong>of</strong> the sort suggested here.<br />

Finally, it can be noted that the positive <strong>and</strong> negative existential pronouns can<br />

also be used as the predicate in a copular construction, although they normally<br />

require some form <strong>of</strong> modification. This is illustrated in (358) for the nonspecific<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the pronouns; it is probably not surprising that the negative existential<br />

pronouns have a more or less idiomatic interpretation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!