15.09.2013 Views

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

Nouns and Noun Phrases - University of Macau Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

966 Syntax <strong>of</strong> Dutch: nouns <strong>and</strong> noun phrases<br />

Table 6: Inflected alle <strong>and</strong> beide in noun phrases headed by a non-count noun<br />

SUBSTANCE<br />

NOUNS<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

NOUNS<br />

MASS<br />

NOUNS<br />

INFLECTED ALLE BEIDE<br />

[+NEUTER] [-NEUTER] [+NEUTER] [-NEUTER]<br />

?<br />

alle water<br />

all water<br />

?<br />

alle verdriet<br />

all sadness<br />

??<br />

alle vee<br />

all cattle<br />

alle wijn/kaas<br />

all wine/cheese<br />

alle moeite<br />

all trouble/hope<br />

??<br />

alle politie<br />

all police<br />

*beide water<br />

both water<br />

*beide verdriet<br />

both sadness<br />

*beide vee<br />

both cattle<br />

*beide wijn/kaas<br />

both wine/cheese<br />

*beide moeite<br />

both trouble<br />

*beide politie<br />

both police<br />

Section 7.1.1 has shown that inflected alle need not express universal<br />

quantification, but may also have a high degree reading; the examples in (63a&b),<br />

illustrate again that alle phrases headed by an abstract non-count noun are quite<br />

common on this reading. Another context in which alle can combine with an<br />

abstract non-count noun is given in (63c); the adjective mogelijke seems to be the<br />

licenser <strong>of</strong> alle here; possibly, alle mogelijke should be analyzed as a constituent.<br />

(63) • High degree alle<br />

a. alle l<strong>of</strong> a′. alle reden<br />

all laudation all reason (every reason)<br />

b. in alle ernst b′. voor alle zekerheid<br />

in all seriousness for all security<br />

c. alle mogelijke moeite/onzin/pracht/...<br />

all possible trouble/nonsense/beauty/...<br />

The universal quantifier alle gives rise to unacceptable or highly marked results<br />

when combined with a deverbal noun. A systematic class <strong>of</strong> exceptions to this rule<br />

is formed by GE-nominalizations, which can be construed relatively freely with alle<br />

(though the results may vary from case to case). This is shown in Table 7, which<br />

also shows that beide is never possible in this context.<br />

Table 7: Inflected alle <strong>and</strong> beide in noun phrases headed by a deverbal noun<br />

BARE STEM<br />

NOMINAL<br />

INFINITIVE<br />

GE-<br />

NOMINALIZATION<br />

INFLECTED ALLE BEIDE<br />

??<br />

alle werk (van deze week)<br />

all work <strong>of</strong> this week<br />

*alle werken<br />

all work<br />

alle gedoe/gezeur/ ? gewerk<br />

all fuss/nagging/working<br />

*beide werk (van deze week)<br />

both work <strong>of</strong> this week<br />

*beide werken<br />

both work<br />

*beide gedoe/gezeur/gewerk<br />

both fuss/nagging/working<br />

This subsection has shown that there are various restrictions on the use <strong>of</strong> alle<br />

in combination with non-count nouns; cf. Table 6 <strong>and</strong> Table 7. Although the nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> these restrictions is far from clear, it is useful to point out that these restrictions<br />

are completely lacking in the case <strong>of</strong> pre-determiner bare al; cf. Table 2 <strong>and</strong> Table<br />

3. This is unexpected on, <strong>and</strong> can therefore be seen as a problem for, the “fusion”<br />

approach, which considers alle a contracted form <strong>of</strong> pre-determiner bare al <strong>and</strong> the<br />

determiner following it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!