12.07.2015 Views

A-manual-for-writers-of-research-papers-theses-and-dissertations

A-manual-for-writers-of-research-papers-theses-and-dissertations

A-manual-for-writers-of-research-papers-theses-and-dissertations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

evidence.But that principle requires another. When we make a claim, we must expect, evenencourage, others to question not just our claim but how we reached it, to ask Why do youbelieve that? It's <strong>of</strong>ten hard to welcome such questions, but we're obliged to listen with goodwill to objections, reservations, <strong>and</strong> qualifications that collectively imply I don't agree, atleast not yet. And the more we challenge old ideas, the more we must be ready toacknowledge <strong>and</strong> answer those questions, because we may be asking others to give up deeplyheld beliefs.When some students encounter these values, they find it difficult, even painful, to live bythem. Some feel that a challenge to what they believe isn't a lively search <strong>for</strong> truth, but apersonal attack on their deepest values. Others retreat to a cynical skepticism that doubtseverything <strong>and</strong> believes nothing. Others fall into mindless relativism: “We're all entitled toour own beliefs, <strong>and</strong> so all beliefs are right <strong>for</strong> those who hold them!” Many turn away froman active life <strong>of</strong> the mind, rejecting not only answers that might disturb their settled beliefs buteven the questions that inspired them.But in our worlds <strong>of</strong> work, scholarship, civic action, <strong>and</strong> even politics, we can't replacetested knowledge <strong>and</strong> hard-won underst<strong>and</strong>ing with personal opinion, a relativistic view <strong>of</strong>truth, or the com<strong>for</strong>table, settled knowledge <strong>of</strong> “authority.”That does not mean we reject long-held <strong>and</strong> time-tested beliefs lightly. We replace themonly after we're persuaded by sound arguments backed by good reasons based on the bestevidence available, <strong>and</strong> after an amiable but searching give-<strong>and</strong>-take that tests thosearguments as severely as we can. In short, we become responsible believers when we canmake our own sound arguments that test <strong>and</strong> evaluate those <strong>of</strong> others.You may find it difficult to see all <strong>of</strong> this at work in a paper written <strong>for</strong> a class, but despiteits cold type, a <strong>research</strong> report written <strong>for</strong> any audience is a conversation, imagined to be sure,but still a cooperative but rigorous inquiry into what we should <strong>and</strong> should not believe.PART IISource Citation15 General Introduction to CitationPractices15.1 Reasons <strong>for</strong> Citing Your Sources15.2 The Requirements <strong>of</strong> Citation15.2.1 Situations Requiring Citations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!