12.07.2015 Views

A-manual-for-writers-of-research-papers-theses-and-dissertations

A-manual-for-writers-of-research-papers-theses-and-dissertations

A-manual-for-writers-of-research-papers-theses-and-dissertations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.2.3 Identify Key Terms Expressing Concepts That Unite the Report <strong>and</strong> Distinguish Its Parts6.2.4 Use Key Terms to Create Subheads That Uniquely Identify Each Section6.2.5 Order Your Reasons6.2.6 Make Your Order Clear with Transitional Words6.2.7 Sketch a Brief Introduction to Each Section <strong>and</strong> Subsection6.2.8 For Each Section, Sketch in Evidence, Acknowledgments, Warrants, <strong>and</strong> Summaries6.2.9 Sketch a Working Conclusion6.3 File Away LeftoversOnce you assemble your argument, you might be ready to draft it. But experienced <strong>writers</strong>know that the time they invest in planning a draft more than pays <strong>of</strong>f when they write it. Todraft effectively, though, you need more than just the elements <strong>of</strong> a sound argument; you needa plan to assemble them into a coherent one. Some plans, however, are better than others.6.1 Avoid Unhelpful PlansAvoid certain approaches.1. Do not organize your report as a narrative <strong>of</strong> your project, especially not as a mysterystory, with your claim revealed at the end. Few readers care what you found first, thenproblems you overcame, then leads you pursued, on <strong>and</strong> on to the end. You see signs <strong>of</strong>that in language like The first issue was . . ., Then I compared. . . . Finally I conclude.2. Do not patch together a series <strong>of</strong> quotations, summaries <strong>of</strong> sources, or downloads fromthe Web. Teachers want to see your thinking, not that <strong>of</strong> others. They especially dislikereports that read like a collage <strong>of</strong> Web screens. Do that, <strong>and</strong> you'll seem not only anamateur but worse, possibly a plagiarist (see 7.9).3. Do not mechanically organize your report around the terms <strong>of</strong> your assignment or topic.If your assignment lists issues to cover, don't think you must address them in the ordergiven. If you were asked or you decide to compare <strong>and</strong> contrast Freud's <strong>and</strong> Jung'sanalyses <strong>of</strong> the imagination, you would not have to organize your report in two parts, thefirst on Freud, the second on Jung. It would be more productive to break those two bigtopics into their parts, then organize your report around them (<strong>for</strong> more on this, see 6.2.5–

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!