12.10.2013 Views

The exposure and toxicity of pesticides to amphibians

The exposure and toxicity of pesticides to amphibians

The exposure and toxicity of pesticides to amphibians

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Amphibians <strong>and</strong> <strong>pesticides</strong><br />

Relyea, R.A. (2005b) Some data for LC50 values that include the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

preda<strong>to</strong>ry stress are included in the ECOTOX data<br />

but it was felt better <strong>to</strong> omit these.<br />

Zaffaroni et al. (1978) Data for Maneb (Maneb 80) <strong>and</strong> Triturus cristatus<br />

described as LC50 is in fact the concentrations at<br />

which LT50 was measured (not LC50s).<br />

After removing this data some 2124 LC50 values remained. Due <strong>to</strong> these issues, some <strong>of</strong> which were<br />

found early on in the collation <strong>of</strong> the data, it was decided as far as possible <strong>to</strong> check all <strong>of</strong> the data<br />

against the original source where this could be obtained. All values were assessed <strong>to</strong> determine if any<br />

further data should be omitted. Reasons for omission included:<br />

• test material not defined (e.g. formulation or technical material),<br />

• formulation data with no % a.i. information,<br />

• lack <strong>of</strong> replication (animals per dose),<br />

• no information on number <strong>of</strong> dose levels used.<br />

In some cases where no detailed information on number <strong>of</strong> dose levels was found, but a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

method was used or other information indicated that sufficient doses were likely <strong>to</strong> have been used,<br />

the studies were accepted. In some cases the source language allowed the values <strong>to</strong> be checked but<br />

other details <strong>of</strong> the study could not be extracted. <strong>The</strong>se values were also excluded. In <strong>to</strong>tal 737 values<br />

were omitted leaving 1387 LC50 values. <strong>The</strong>se were divided in<strong>to</strong> tables depending on test period<br />

duration (24h, 48h, 72h, 96h <strong>and</strong> ‘all other durations’).<br />

<strong>The</strong> selected data for 96h studies is shown in Table 11. Data for other st<strong>and</strong>ard test durations (24, 48<br />

<strong>and</strong> 72h) are shown in Appendices I <strong>to</strong> L. <strong>The</strong> data that was omitted is shown in Appendix M along<br />

with the reasons they were not included.<br />

Supporting publications 2012:EN-343 40<br />

<strong>The</strong> present document has been produced <strong>and</strong> adopted by the bodies identified above as author(s). This task has been carried out exclusively<br />

by the author(s) in the context <strong>of</strong> a contract between the European Food Safety Authority <strong>and</strong> the author(s), awarded following a tender<br />

procedure. <strong>The</strong> present document is published complying with the transparency principle <strong>to</strong> which the Authority is subject. It may not be<br />

considered as an output adopted by the Authority. <strong>The</strong> European food Safety Authority reserves its rights, view <strong>and</strong> position as regards the<br />

issues addressed <strong>and</strong> the conclusions reached in the present document, without prejudice <strong>to</strong> the rights <strong>of</strong> the authors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!