26.12.2014 Views

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo Savić

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo Savić

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo Savić

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3rd International Scientific and Professional Conference<br />

CORRIDOR <strong>10</strong> - a sustainable way of integrations<br />

Table 2: Number of electronic tickets of different types [1]<br />

Company / Card<br />

type<br />

Četrta pot Margento Princ SUM<br />

MIFARE Classic 560 / / 560<br />

MIFARE Plus / / / /<br />

DESFIRE EV1 1120 7<strong>10</strong> 350 2180<br />

SUM 1680 7<strong>10</strong> 350 2740<br />

Table 3: Number of terminal equipment of different types (validators, mobile terminals, sales points)<br />

[1]<br />

The upper numbers show that Mifare DesFire card is used in more than 75% and almost 80% of<br />

terminal equipment is compatible with this technology. Regarding this and directions from general<br />

overview of electronic ticketing technology the Mifare DesFire technology is proposed to be used for<br />

implementation of integrated ticketing system in Slovenia. Existing differences in equipment can be<br />

easily overtaken by replacing some older terminal equipment and contactless cards.<br />

Also we analyzed compatibility of existing equipment with the new technologies. Only small part of<br />

equipment supports NFC technology for using NFC mobile phones for electronic ticketing and there is<br />

no support for EMV standard that enables using standard bank cards for electronic ticketing. While<br />

these are technologies of the near future the proposal is that the new terminal equipment that will<br />

replace the exploited one should support these technologies. In this way in few next years the<br />

equipment in Slovenia will be prepared for oncoming technologies.<br />

Special attention was put to consider possibility of using bank cards for electronic ticketing. Beside<br />

analyze of word developments and implementations of bank cards in public transport the meetings<br />

with Slovenian banks were done. The first limitation found was that at the moment there are no<br />

contactless bank cards in mass use, just a few pilot projects. With participation of banks in public<br />

transport system there will be new players and consequently new organization and business models<br />

should be prepared. While all this cannot be solved in short time, the suggestion is, that the electronic<br />

ticketing system in Slovenia in the first phase should be implemented without bank cards, but the<br />

equipment should be step by step prepared to be capable to include bank cards in the system. For<br />

that time we also expect that world standards for using bank cards in public transport will be<br />

developed by word players in this field like MasterCard and Visa.<br />

6. DATA MODEL OF INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT<br />

A problem to achieve interoperability of existing systems is principally not a matter of different HW<br />

technology (card and terminal equipment technology) but rather of divergent data models underlying<br />

terminal and back-office applications at ticketing system providers. Not a single data model used in<br />

existing Slovenian ticketing systems complies with the international or national standards; actually<br />

they are custom designed and developed from the scratch in consideration of particular transport<br />

operators’ needs. As a consequence, all technology providers consider their data model and its<br />

implementations a business secret and are not willing to share their model with each other.<br />

Overview of the world standards on ticketing systems’ interoperability additionally supports the above<br />

conclusion for data models being the core problem [16]. Since interoperability is a problem in all<br />

systems a variety of standards was developed focusing on data models. Low level is dealt with in EN<br />

1545 standard [17] dated in 2005 which defines elementary data types, code lists and data elements.<br />

This standard is accepted worldwide but it only defines data elements without reference to data model<br />

itself. The most recognized public transport interoperability standards are ITSO [18] in United<br />

Kingdom, Calypso [5] in France and Belgium, SDOA [19] in Netherlands, VDV Kernaplikation [20] in<br />

Germany and APTA [21] in USA. All these standards put the data model in focus and all of them<br />

support compatibility with EN 1545.<br />

Europe wide interoperability is subject of Interoperable Fare Management Project (IFM) [22] that<br />

started in 2008 where the majority of European organizations involved in national standards for public<br />

Belgrade, 2012 179

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!