Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo SaviÄ
Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo SaviÄ
Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo SaviÄ
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
3rd International Scientific and Professional Conference<br />
CORRIDOR <strong>10</strong> - a sustainable way of integrations<br />
Table 2: Number of electronic tickets of different types [1]<br />
Company / Card<br />
type<br />
Četrta pot Margento Princ SUM<br />
MIFARE Classic 560 / / 560<br />
MIFARE Plus / / / /<br />
DESFIRE EV1 1120 7<strong>10</strong> 350 2180<br />
SUM 1680 7<strong>10</strong> 350 2740<br />
Table 3: Number of terminal equipment of different types (validators, mobile terminals, sales points)<br />
[1]<br />
The upper numbers show that Mifare DesFire card is used in more than 75% and almost 80% of<br />
terminal equipment is compatible with this technology. Regarding this and directions from general<br />
overview of electronic ticketing technology the Mifare DesFire technology is proposed to be used for<br />
implementation of integrated ticketing system in Slovenia. Existing differences in equipment can be<br />
easily overtaken by replacing some older terminal equipment and contactless cards.<br />
Also we analyzed compatibility of existing equipment with the new technologies. Only small part of<br />
equipment supports NFC technology for using NFC mobile phones for electronic ticketing and there is<br />
no support for EMV standard that enables using standard bank cards for electronic ticketing. While<br />
these are technologies of the near future the proposal is that the new terminal equipment that will<br />
replace the exploited one should support these technologies. In this way in few next years the<br />
equipment in Slovenia will be prepared for oncoming technologies.<br />
Special attention was put to consider possibility of using bank cards for electronic ticketing. Beside<br />
analyze of word developments and implementations of bank cards in public transport the meetings<br />
with Slovenian banks were done. The first limitation found was that at the moment there are no<br />
contactless bank cards in mass use, just a few pilot projects. With participation of banks in public<br />
transport system there will be new players and consequently new organization and business models<br />
should be prepared. While all this cannot be solved in short time, the suggestion is, that the electronic<br />
ticketing system in Slovenia in the first phase should be implemented without bank cards, but the<br />
equipment should be step by step prepared to be capable to include bank cards in the system. For<br />
that time we also expect that world standards for using bank cards in public transport will be<br />
developed by word players in this field like MasterCard and Visa.<br />
6. DATA MODEL OF INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT<br />
A problem to achieve interoperability of existing systems is principally not a matter of different HW<br />
technology (card and terminal equipment technology) but rather of divergent data models underlying<br />
terminal and back-office applications at ticketing system providers. Not a single data model used in<br />
existing Slovenian ticketing systems complies with the international or national standards; actually<br />
they are custom designed and developed from the scratch in consideration of particular transport<br />
operators’ needs. As a consequence, all technology providers consider their data model and its<br />
implementations a business secret and are not willing to share their model with each other.<br />
Overview of the world standards on ticketing systems’ interoperability additionally supports the above<br />
conclusion for data models being the core problem [16]. Since interoperability is a problem in all<br />
systems a variety of standards was developed focusing on data models. Low level is dealt with in EN<br />
1545 standard [17] dated in 2005 which defines elementary data types, code lists and data elements.<br />
This standard is accepted worldwide but it only defines data elements without reference to data model<br />
itself. The most recognized public transport interoperability standards are ITSO [18] in United<br />
Kingdom, Calypso [5] in France and Belgium, SDOA [19] in Netherlands, VDV Kernaplikation [20] in<br />
Germany and APTA [21] in USA. All these standards put the data model in focus and all of them<br />
support compatibility with EN 1545.<br />
Europe wide interoperability is subject of Interoperable Fare Management Project (IFM) [22] that<br />
started in 2008 where the majority of European organizations involved in national standards for public<br />
Belgrade, 2012 179