26.12.2014 Views

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo Savić

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo Savić

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo Savić

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3rd International Scientific and Professional Conference<br />

CORRIDOR <strong>10</strong> - a sustainable way of integrations<br />

To simplify the calculus, decrease or increase of rail or wheel noise influence for <strong>10</strong> dB is used in the<br />

numerical example. Still, in practical terms, it corresponds to an increase or decrease of noise at<br />

emphasized corrugation or roughness of the wheel rim.<br />

FIG. 12. Total noise level in case of various noises induced by wheel and rail<br />

If the noise that one of the elements is creating is greater, then greater effects in total noise reduction<br />

are achieved by intervention on the element that is greater source of noise. This can be illustrated with<br />

a simple numerical example. Let’s suppose that one of the elements (wheel or rail) emits the noise of<br />

the level “A” expressed in dB, and another of the level “B”. If the intervention reduces the noise level of<br />

one element by, for example, <strong>10</strong> dB, simple mathematical analysis (2) can prove that total noise level<br />

is less if noise reduction measures are applied precisely on the element which emits greater noise:<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

log(<strong>10</strong><br />

A <strong>10</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

B<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

)<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

log(<strong>10</strong><br />

A<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

B <strong>10</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

)<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

A<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

A B<br />

<strong>10</strong> <strong>10</strong><br />

A B<br />

B<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

(2)<br />

This proves that efficient noise control must contain design and maintenance measures of both<br />

elements, so it can be intervened in time on the element which emits greater levels of noise.<br />

6. CONCLUSION<br />

Railway infrastructure investments have to be planned in a way that maximises positive impact on<br />

economic growth and minimises negative impact on the environment.<br />

The efficient solution for noise emission requires the cooperation and common maintenance strategy<br />

of both, vehicle and infrastructure owners. This is a serious task because of possible negative effects<br />

of noise on human health, life quality and productivity. This problem cannot be solved by appealing to<br />

conscience and responsibility of infrastructure owners and vehicle owners. The way to solve this<br />

problem is to define legal and technical regulations in the field of railway noise control.<br />

In this sense, it is necessary to harmonize national legal and technical regulations with EU regulations<br />

in the area "Railway applications". Harmonization of regulations is a process that must include<br />

education of professionals for railway infrastructure and rolling stock in the area of actual application of<br />

regulations on railway. This is a necessary condition for the realization of the idea of interoperability of<br />

railway systems across Europe and beyond.<br />

Belgrade, 2012 262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!