26.12.2014 Views

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo Savić

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo Savić

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo Savić

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3rd International Scientific and Professional Conference<br />

CORRIDOR <strong>10</strong> - a sustainable way of integrations<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

This paper describes the relatively new UIC 406 method for calculating capacity consumption on<br />

railway lines. The UIC 406 method is an easy and effective way of calculating the capacity<br />

consumption, but it is possible to expound the UIC 406 method in different ways which can lead to<br />

different capacity consumptions. This paper describes the UIC 406 method and how it is expounded in<br />

Slovenian.<br />

The UIC 406 leaflet from year 2004 [1] describes a simple, but fast and effective way to evaluate the<br />

capacity utilization of railway lines. The capacity analyses carried out during the last years using the<br />

UIC 406 method have been presented in a number of papers (e.g. [3], [5] and [7]). However, it is<br />

possible to expound the UIC 406 method in different ways which can lead to different results. In spite<br />

of that fact, hardly any analyses of the differences have been carried out.<br />

Any railway-infrastructure evaluation, in order to be generally valid, must be underpinned by a<br />

common definition of capacity among railway infrastructure managers (IM). Due to the different<br />

concepts and procedures concerning capacity and the resulting calculations applied by IMs, a<br />

comparison is not feasible and general conclusions are not possible, which means that a unique<br />

procedure must be developed.<br />

2. DEFINITIONS<br />

This paper uses terminology usually used in the railway literature. However, since the terminology<br />

differs from country to country, an overview of the terminology used in this paper is provided in table 1.<br />

Table 1: Short description of terminology [5]<br />

term<br />

explanation<br />

block occupation<br />

time<br />

buffer time<br />

headway<br />

distance<br />

headway time<br />

running time<br />

supplement<br />

secondary delay<br />

line<br />

nodes<br />

stations<br />

junctions<br />

line sections<br />

The time a block section (the length of track between two block<br />

signals, cab signals or both) is occupied by a train<br />

The time difference between actual headway and minimum allowable<br />

headway<br />

The distance between the front ends of two consecutive trains<br />

moving along the same track in the same direction. The minimum<br />

headway distance is the shortest possible distance at a certain travel<br />

speed allowed by the signalling and/or safety system<br />

The time interval between two trains or the (time) spacing of trains or<br />

the time interval between the passing of the front ends of two<br />

consecutive (vehicles or) trains moving along the same (lane or) track<br />

in the same direction<br />

The difference between the planned running time and the minimum<br />

running time<br />

A delay caused by a delay or cancellation of one or more other trains<br />

A link between two large nodes and usually the sum of more than<br />

one line section<br />

Points of a network in which at least two lines converge. Nodes can<br />

be stations or junctions.<br />

Points of a network where overtaking, crossing or direction reversals<br />

are possible, including marshalling yards<br />

Point of a network in which at least two lines converge and neither<br />

overtaking, crossing nor direction reversals are possible<br />

The part of a line, in which the number of trains and the infrastructure<br />

and signaling conditions do not change fundamentally.<br />

Belgrade, 2012 199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!