Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo SaviÄ

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3rd International Scientific and Professional Conference CORRIDOR 10 - a sustainable way of integrations defined. If it’s exceeded, it requires performing works right after the track recording run. The Institute for Standardization of Serbia has adopted and published four out of six parts of this group of standards [13]. Professional work of the Institute in the field of standardization, "Railway Applications" is conducted within the Technical Committee P256. Considering the complexity of the field, "Railway Applications", the Technical Committee has two sub committees: for civil engineering and for mechanical engineering part. The Technical Committee P256 brings together representatives of the University (the Faculty of Civil Engineering and the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Belgrade), the Railway Directorate, designers, contractors and industry in the field of railways. This structure corresponds to the standardization committee structure in the field of railways, according to the experience of the European Union [10]. However, practical application of adopted standards EN 13848 on Serbian Railways will be possible only after linking them with technical regulations. 4. CONCLUSION Undisturbed and efficient traffic on the European railway network requires harmonized characteristics of the infrastructure and rolling stock, as well as the efficient interconnection of information and communication systems of different railway administrations and operators. The incompatibility of the existing technical regulations in the area of railway infrastructure maintenance in the Republic of Serbia with the EU regulations is obvious. Existing Serbian railway regulations and logistics concerning track inspection, quality evaluation and correction of track geometry are in collision with those of the European Union. Solving this problem, which represents the essential barrier for integrations of the Serbian Railways to the European railway network, requires adoption of legal and technical frameworks for the application of European standards. Although the Railway Act (Official Gazette RS, No.18/2005) coincides with the corresponding European Union Directives, its decrees are still not applied in practice in the area of maintenance. According to this Act, railway infrastructure must be maintained in a condition which ensures safe and unobstructed railway traffic, as well as quality and regular transport. In this purpose, constant supervision and occasional inspections must be performed, as well as correction of determined defects. Creation of an annual maintenance plan is performed according to the existing technical regulations for the area of maintenance, which is adjusted to the application of track recording vehicle EM 80L. The mentioned track recording vehicle cannot measure parameters defined according to [1]. Quantifications of the track geometry quality based on the locally defined parameters in the Instruction 339 essentially disable the access and usage of the public railway infrastructure to all interested railway operators. Technical limitations for the application of the European standards in the area of maintenance planning are: lack of database on the reference track geometry on the existing Serbian Railways network, the lack of strategy and material means for filling in the base, incompetence in the level of expertise of the personnel for work on modern track recording vehicles, lack of knowledge in the area of management and maintenance of railway infrastructure, not following Directives, Technical Specifications of Interoperability and technical standards in this area. Only after solving the given legal and technical limitations, can the Directorate for Railways possibly achieve harmonization of technical regulations in the area of maintenance. On the contrary, harmonized regulations could not be applicable in practice. Belgrade, 2012 59
3rd International Scientific and Professional Conference CORRIDOR 10 - a sustainable way of integrations ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia through the research projects “Research of technical-technological, staff and organisational capacity of Serbian Railways, from the viewpoint of current and future European Union requirements” (No. 36012) and “Reconstruction and revitalization of railway infrastructure in accordance with regional development” (No. 680-00-140/2012-09/10). REFERENCES [1] CEN: EN 13848-1:2003+A1:2008 - Railway applications - Track - Track geometry quality – Part 1: Characterisation of track geometry [2] CEN: EN 13848-2:2006 - Railway applications - Track - Track geometry quality – Part 2: Measuring systems - Track recording vehicles [3] CEN: EN 13848-3:2009 - Railway applications - Track - Track geometry quality - Part 3: Measuring systems - Track construction and maintenance machines [4] CEN: EN 13848-4:2011 - Railway applications - Track - Track geometry quality - Part 4: Measuring systems - Manual and lightweight devices [5] CEN: EN 13848-5:2008+A1:2010 - Railway applications - Track - Track geometry quality - Part 5: Geometric quality levels [6] ERA - Europäische Eisenbahnagentur: Referat Interoperabilität, Transeuropäisches konventionelles Eisenbahnsystem, Technische Spezifikation für die Interoperabilität - Teilsystem Infrastruktur, S. 1-106, 2008 [7] L. Puzavac: Modelling of track geometry deterioration, MSc Thesis, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia, 2009 [8] L. Puzavac, Popovic Z., Lazarevic L.: European standards for track geometry quality, Conference Proceedings, Zlatibor, may 2011, pp. 509 – 514 [9] L. Puzavac, Popovic Z., Lazarevic L., Ivic M., Kosijer M.: The maintenance planning of Serbian railway infrastructure in accordance with European standards, 19th International Symposium EURO-ŽEL 2011 "Recent Challenges for European Railways", Žilina, 8th-9th June 2011, Proceedings, pp.393-400M. Walter: Interoperabilität und technische Normung der Eisenbahninfrastruktur in Österreich, ETR, S. 312-315, Mai 2006 [10] UIC Code 518: Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour – Safety – Track fatigue – Ride quality, 3rd edition, October 2005. [11] http://www.cen.eu/cen/Products/EN/Pages/default.aspx (September 2012) [12] http://www.iss.rs/tc/national_committee_id=399 (September 2012) [13] Z. Popovic: Interoperability and standardization of railway infrastructure of Serbian railways, Railway Technical Review, Hamburg, ISSUE 4/2007, Volume 47, pp. 6-9 [14] Zajednica Jugoslovenskih železnica: Uputstvo (339) o jedinstvenim kriterijumima za kontrolu stanja pruga na mreži JŽ (Instruction 339 on unique criteria for track condition control), Belgrade, 2002 Belgrade, 2012 60
Page 1 and 2:
3rd International Scientific and Pr
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18: 3rd International Scientific and Pr
Page 67: 3rd International Scientific and Pr
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
R [m] V [km/h] n n [mm] 3rd Interna
Page 307 and 308:
QNx [%] QNx [%] 3rd International S
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325:
show all

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo SaviÄ

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

Zbornik radova Koridor 10 - Kirilo SaviÄ