Entwicklung eines Kollaborationsnetzwerkes - Bergische Universität ...

Einsparpotential im Vergleich zur
Rastersuche [%]
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
‐10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
17%
25%
25%
Einsparpotentiale der Verfahren im Mittel
|A I,Red |=100.000; n SC =10
16%
25%
0%
23%
29%
40%
40%
28%
40%
10%
32%
38%
49%
39%
39%
49%
20%
37%
45%
56%
48%
48%
1 2 3 4 5 6
Kriterien [n]
56%
28%
42%
50%
61%
54%
55%
61%
35%
Einsparpotential im Vergleich zur
Rastersuche [%]
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
‐10%
25%
25%
25%
38%
38%
39%
25%
29%
32%
|A I,Red |=100; n SC =10
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
16%
0%
17%
10%
37%
46%
38%
42%
48%
44%
53%
46%
49%
54%
28%
20%
27%
28%
32%
49%
57%
51%
54%
59%
1 2 3 4 5 6
Kriterien [n]
33%
Einsparpotential im Vergleich zur
Rastersuche [%]
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
‐10%
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
27%
|A I,Red |=50; n SC =10
36%
36%
36%
37%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
16%
0%
16%
10%
44%
44%
45%
19%
36%
32%
19%
50%
50%
51%
24%
41%
40%
26%
54%
54%
56%
26%
46%
45%
31%
1 2 3 4 5 6
Kriterien [n]
Agg [Pot.] ‐ N ‐ N
SC (0) ‐ AW (0,33) ‐ Agg
SC (0) ‐ IR A‐E 1.C (1,0|0,25) ‐ Agg
SC (0) ‐ IR A‐E 3.C (1,0|0,25|0,25) ‐ Agg
SC (0) ‐ IR A‐E 2.C (1,0|0,25) ‐ Agg
SC (0) ‐ LD ‐ Agg
SC (1) ‐ LD ‐ Agg
Die von oben nach unten aufgelisteten Verfahren werden über die Balken von links nach rechts dargestellt.
Abbildung 6‐15: Mittlere Einsparpotentiale der Reduktionsverfahren
152