20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

156<br />

from different levels within the department, and the areas which require change as well as how the organisational<br />

changes can be implemented were the centre of the focus group discussions.<br />

The focus group is moderated by a researcher (Vogt, King & King, 2004) whose role is to introduce the<br />

members to one another, introduce the focus group, and gently ‘steer’ the discussion. The role of the moderator<br />

can be to remind the group of the focus of the group discussion, ensure participation by all members of the group,<br />

and to see to any disagreements or other needs of group members. The moderator also has the essential task of<br />

setting certain limits and rules, such as the beginning and the end of the process, and certain ground rules which<br />

need to be adhered to in order to ensure the smooth running of the process (Willig, 2008). It is often the<br />

researcher that ‘facilitates’ the group processes in order to ensure the pre-planned range of issues is covered,<br />

while also allowing material to enter the discussion. As such, it is essential that the researcher does not dominate<br />

proceedings and, if necessary, the researcher should steer the discussion along more productive lines should it<br />

seem to be ‘running out of steam’ (Howitt & Cramer, 2007). A further task of the moderator includes the creation<br />

of a positive experience for participants, an essential component of the Appreciative Inquiry technique which is in<br />

its very nature a positive experience for the respondent and social setting (Gibbs, 1997).<br />

Discussion Box 14: How Focus Groups Fit AI Methodologies<br />

Focus group interviewing played a part in two of the five AI cycle steps, ‘Design’ and<br />

‘Destiny’. Participant input was used to design the ‘innovative service’, i.e. to voice their<br />

own narrative upon changes which had been suggested in the previous interview stage.<br />

This means that organisational changes to areas of the workplace that are not working as<br />

well as the areas identified in the log and interview phases were uncovered, together with<br />

action plans for change. The end goal of the focus groups was to have a number of<br />

workable, feasible organisational changes recorded which can then be typed up by the lead<br />

researcher (Jermaine <strong>Ravalier</strong>) to be presented to organisational management and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!