20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

249<br />

Chapter VIII Part 4: Synthesised Results & Local Stress Theory<br />

The original idea behind conducting a mixed methods study, in which the qualitative and quantitative<br />

elements were conducted and analysed separately, was to conduct research in which results would not then be<br />

mixed for comparison. Indeed the quantitative phases had been designed to provide a contextual analysis of the<br />

organisation whereas the qualitative Appreciative Inquiry aspect would lead to organisational development and<br />

change interventions. However, upon completion of data analysis it was realised that some of the findings<br />

converged and supported each other. Therefore the analytical findings of the qualitative and quantitative aspects<br />

have been compared to discover which resonate closely with each other as well as those that do not.<br />

MSIT & MBI<br />

Interviews<br />

Focus Groups<br />

Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Phase 5<br />

1 month 1 month 2 weeks 1 week 1 month<br />

Logs<br />

Local Stress Theory<br />

MSIT & MBI<br />

Figure 10: overview of the project structure<br />

According to Song et al. (2011) contemporary organisational stress literature is increasingly taking into<br />

account the effects that daily hassles can have on stress-related outcomes. The authors stress that because minor<br />

stressors tend to happen regularly throughout the working day they can have as much, if not greater, impact than<br />

major life events. Despite this, the transactional model of stress argues that both daily hassles and major events

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!