20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92<br />

interaction between demands, control and social support will also be<br />

assessed as to the relevance of the phenomena in research.<br />

The majority of the research literature to date has focussed upon<br />

the experience of major life events as antecedents to the experience of<br />

stress in the workplace (Song et al., 2011). <strong>Research</strong> designs have<br />

therefore reflected this, with cross-sectional and longitudinal survey<br />

designs being readily used in order to investigate major life events. The<br />

approach toward studying stress is slowly changing however. For example<br />

an early publication within the daily hassles literature by Wheeler and Reis<br />

(1991, pp. 340) describes daily stressors as those that “fill most of our<br />

working time and occupy the vast majority of our conscious attention”,<br />

and research is increasingly showing that daily hassles may have the<br />

potential to impact as strongly as major life events (see Chapter 2). The<br />

presented study takes into account both of the prevailing approaches.<br />

One of the most important outcomes of this thesis regards the<br />

implementation of organisational change interventions in order to improve<br />

upon employee experience of stress in the workplace. While many<br />

conceptualisations have been put forward with regard to organisational<br />

change, one of the most widely known and understood is that of Hard<br />

Systems (HSMs) and Soft Systems (SSMs) models of change. Hard<br />

systems methodologists are typified by quantification within the positivist<br />

tradition, with quantifiable aims and objectives set to be met and<br />

therefore enhance an organisation (Petkov et al., 2008). On the other<br />

hand, Soft Systems approaches are ‘messy’ or ‘fuzzy’, and see the<br />

organisation as a more complex entity. Indeed SSM integrate the<br />

understanding that complex human systems make organisations and<br />

organisational change initiatives vague with very little scope for setting<br />

objectifiable aims and objectives. It is the argument taken within the<br />

presented research that HSMC are unsuitable for purpose, particularly<br />

when attempting to address employee health and wellbeing structures<br />

such as stress and daily hassles which are by their very nature subjective<br />

phenomena.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!