20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

237<br />

<strong>Ravalier</strong> as lead researcher and Dr Andrew McVicar as a scribe. As such two methods of recording the data to<br />

come out of the focus group were utilised. Firstly Dr Andrew McVicar took handwritten notes throughout relating to<br />

the progress and outcomes from each focus group. Secondly, Jermaine <strong>Ravalier</strong> recorded outcomes and<br />

interventions at the front of the room on a flip chart. Working in this manner allows individual participants to check<br />

what is recorded on the flip chart, and comment whether they believe the recordings to be correct or whether they<br />

need adjustment. Furthermore, participants were offered the chance to read through Dr McVicar’s notes at the end<br />

of the focus group. Following the focus group Dr McVicar gave his computer-typed notes to Jermaine <strong>Ravalier</strong> for<br />

analysis and safe keeping, while Jermaine <strong>Ravalier</strong> also typed the flip chart notes onto a Word processing<br />

programme. The hand-written copies were destroyed using secure recycling, and the computer copies of the work<br />

were stored on two separate laptop computers under password-protected, hidden folders.<br />

To ensure ethical considerations were taken into account, dedicated ground rules were set at the beginning<br />

of each focus group (see Appendix 11) and also set in an easily visible place for all to see in each focus group. The<br />

ground rules included keeping everything confidential, so that anything said within each group would remain within<br />

the group discussion, and that nobody will be named as part of the discussions, or within the results or<br />

organisational report which emanated from the focus groups. In order to ensure anonymity individuals were<br />

requested to introduce themselves separately, using first names only, while the first name given did not<br />

necessarily have to be their own.<br />

Focus groups completed Stages 3 and 4 of the Appreciative Inquiry cycle. Stage 3 was Design in which<br />

feasible changes and action plans are considered, thus building upon what was found in the previous stages.<br />

Stage 4 is Destiny, in which action plans are finalised and furthermore plans implementation scheduled. Therefore

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!