20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

200<br />

provides evidence for the argument that there is a strong relationship between high levels of burnout and high<br />

levels of stress-related psychosocial hazards.<br />

Table 21: t-test and non-parametric mann-whitney U test results for high versus non-high scoring MBI participants on the MSIT factors.<br />

MSIT<br />

Factor<br />

Sample<br />

Population (MBI<br />

Mean (n) Standard<br />

Deviation<br />

t<br />

Demands<br />

Control<br />

Managerial<br />

Support<br />

Peer<br />

Support*<br />

Relationship<br />

s*<br />

Role<br />

Degrees Sig.<br />

of (2-<br />

Scoring)<br />

Freedom tailed)<br />

High Scoring 25.00 (7) 4.47<br />

Low Scoring 22.70 (10) 3.89<br />

1.13 15 .276<br />

High Scoring 18.57 (7) 4.50<br />

Low Scoring 23.30 (10) 3.37<br />

-2.48 15 .025<br />

High Scoring 11.71 (7) 4.42<br />

Low Scoring 19.30 (10) 3.09<br />

-4.18 15 .001<br />

High Scoring 11.43 (7) 3.31 (U)<br />

Low Scoring 16.10 (10) 1.85 8<br />

8.65 .001<br />

High Scoring 11.43 (7) 3.82 (U)<br />

Low Scoring 6.60 (10) 1.65 7<br />

7.57 .005<br />

High Scoring 15.14 (7) 3.60<br />

Low Scoring 22.00 (10) 1.76<br />

-5.26 15 .001<br />

High Scoring 5.14 (7) 1.86<br />

-6.09 15 .001<br />

Change<br />

Low Scoring 11.40 (10) 2.22<br />

*Equality of variances not assumed. Therefore non-parametric Mann-Whitney U results reported.<br />

Differences between Tables 15 and 21 would suggest that the experiences of employees have shifted over<br />

the previous 12 months, and that the organisation consists of a dynamic and changeable environment. The major<br />

difference between the two phases is the lack of significance between the groups in Survey 2 for the Demands<br />

factor. It can therefore be stated that, within the outcomes of Phase 2, the experience of Demands had no<br />

significant impact on stress-related outcomes compared with the situation at the time of Phase 1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!