20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

313<br />

that individual employees can withstand only a certain amount of stress before resources are depleted and the<br />

stress leads to a strain reaction. The approach is taken into account within the presented research in that both<br />

daily hassles and major life events are assessed in combination with employee burnout. Indeed the presented<br />

research assessed how organisational stress impacts upon the experience of burnout using both qualitative and<br />

quantitative methods, with results affirming the notion that the experience of both chronic daily hassles and major<br />

life events can impact upon burnout. The quantitative outcomes clearly show that psychosocial stressors as<br />

measured by the MSIT (which takes into account the major life event approach) impact strongly upon Burnout as a<br />

stress-related outcome. Equally the qualitative results indicate that individuals were experiencing psychosocial<br />

stressors in the form of daily hassles, although without a related assessment of stress-related outcomes it is<br />

difficult to attribute these hassles to a stress-related outcome. However, it must be noted that quantification of the<br />

stimulus approach is difficult due to the subjectivity involved in any psychosocial stress self-report measures.<br />

Therefore it is difficult to assess how much of a particular stressor, or what combination of stressors, is needed for<br />

an individual’s resources to become depleted and a strain reaction recorded.<br />

The transactional approach however (Chapter II, Section 1a.3) describes the experience of stress as the<br />

interaction between an individual and his/her environment which is mediated by the coping mechanisms available<br />

for the individual employee to ‘deal with’ the stressor. It is clear that the presented research cannot take into<br />

account the whole of the transactional approach – the work in no way directly assesses individual emotionfocussed<br />

coping mechanisms described within the model. Neither does the presented research attempt to assess<br />

or describe the appraisal categories assumed within the model. Bond and Bunce (2000) however discuss problemfocussed<br />

approaches as primary organisational change interventions which, in a manner similar to the presented

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!