20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

174<br />

Complete anonymity and confidentiality throughout the questionnaire, log and interview phases were<br />

essential. With the first two of these stages anonymity was ensured in two ways: individuals either completed the<br />

questioning for each stage online with no personally identifiable mentioned, or individuals completed a hard copy<br />

and returned via stamped addressed envelope to Jermaine <strong>Ravalier</strong> at <strong>Anglia</strong> <strong>Ruskin</strong> University, again without the<br />

inclusion of any personally identifiable information. Simply by taking part in the survey and log elements of the<br />

study individuals had given consent to take part, and they were informed numerous times previously as to the<br />

nature of these studies.<br />

Informed consent was gained for the focus groups and interviews by initially explaining the nature of the<br />

study, and asking individuals to complete a consent form should they wish to take part. Additionally participants<br />

were given a copy of an Information Sheet specifically designed for these two stages. Anonymity for interview<br />

participants was assured by data kept in a locked cupboard on premises outside of the participating organisation,<br />

and no identifiable information kept on the recordings of the interviews (which were kept in hidden, passwordprotected<br />

files on two separate personal computers). Additionally, when interviews were transcribed no<br />

identifiable information was included and neither was any personal information contained. Confidentiality was<br />

ensured during the focus groups by making one of the ground rules at the beginning that ‘what stays in this group<br />

meeting stays in the group meeting’, and again any analysis of the group work was anonymised by removing any<br />

personally identifiable information. Finally, individuals were offered the opportunity to withdraw information from<br />

the interview phase at any time. The same offer was not made for the previous phases however, due to the lack of<br />

personally identifiable information recorded during these processes.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!