20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

264<br />

there was a clear positive outcome with respect to Peer Support (c). Indeed, the support and guidance provided<br />

by fellow colleagues allowed respondents to achieve more at work and to deal with stressful situations.<br />

9b.2) What Needs Improvement<br />

The results already presented show that there have been a number of areas both quantitatively and<br />

qualitatively which were ‘working well’ and do not match. Similarly both quantitative and qualitative outcomes<br />

found areas requiring improvement which do not complement each other. Figures 18 and 19 depict the qualitative<br />

and quantitative results which cannot be matched with any others.<br />

Figure 19: quantitative MSIT factors which have not been found to mix with any qualitative outcomes.<br />

(a)<br />

Peer Support<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

Role<br />

Control<br />

One clear area of divergence between the qualitative and quantitative outcomes was the finding within the<br />

MSIT that Peer Support was an area of working which required improvement, whereas the qualitative results clearly<br />

found this factor to provide a positive experience. Indeed, for many respondents Peer Support was an important

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!