20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66<br />

who designs, carries out and analyses the research whereas participative<br />

approaches ensure that at least some control over the process lies in the<br />

hands of the participants (Diaz & Simmons, 1999). Northway (2010)<br />

recognised that describing a piece of research as 'participatory' can mean<br />

different things for different researchers, and so suggested a number of<br />

common features which can help to distinguish between participatory and<br />

other research approaches:<br />

1. "Centrality of the participant to the research" (pp. 175). The views, thoughts and<br />

opinions of the participant are most important, rather than researcher knowledge or<br />

expertise. Therefore the differing priorities of individuals need to be appropriately<br />

managed throughout the process.<br />

2. "A commitment to changing the balance of power" (pp. 176). Participants need to be<br />

empowered through the process, and thus the power balances within the participating<br />

population are challenged. According to Cornwall and Jewkes (1995) the issues of<br />

power and control are essential in participative research in that it allows active<br />

participation and choice.<br />

3. "A different role for the researcher" (pp. 176). In traditional positivist studies the<br />

researcher takes a detached, objective position throughout the work. In participatory<br />

research however the researcher takes an active role as a committed participant and<br />

facilitator throughout the process.<br />

4. "Participation in all stages of the research process" (pp. 177). Participatory<br />

researchers attempt to include participants in every stage of the research process, from<br />

research question definition and data analysis to the implementation of the research<br />

outcomes. Despite this being the ideal situation, it is often not attainable for a variety<br />

of reasons and so the amount of participation can alter and change throughout the<br />

research process. Indeed it is this that Cornwall and Jewkes (1995) describes as the<br />

most striking difference between participatory and traditional research.<br />

5. "The production of 'useful' knowledge" (pp. 177). Due to the participatory nature of<br />

this type of research, including the bottom-up approach often utilised, the outcomes<br />

will be useful for the employees and overall organisation as a whole.<br />

6. "A commitment to action" (pp. 178). Traditional research has often meant a marked<br />

gap between the usefulness of research outcomes to the researcher in comparison to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!