20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

73<br />

bureaucracy (Salaman, 2000). Therefore employees function with few<br />

rules, policies and procedures (Kane-Urrabazo, 2006), although this means<br />

that employees need to share the same vision and values as those in<br />

charge of the organisation.<br />

The greatest strength of this culture is its ability to react quickly to<br />

changes, but a large drawback is that their success depends largely upon<br />

the abilities of the person or people at the centre of the organisation<br />

recognising the need for change. Therefore, should those at the top of the<br />

hierarchy (or the centre of the web) not recognise the need for change<br />

quickly, or the change implemented is inappropriate, it could cause<br />

problems for the whole of the organisation. Additionally, size within the<br />

organisation can be a problem when one of the strands of the web breaks<br />

(Brown, 1998). As such organisations with a power culture are threatened<br />

by the increasing size of the firm and the death or departure of central<br />

figures (Salaman, 2000). This could mean that the organisation is spread<br />

over too large an area for recovery and organisational effectiveness and<br />

efficiency could be greatly affected. However, these organisations are<br />

usually tough and abrasive and more interested in the ends than the<br />

means used to get there. Employees who are confident about the use of<br />

power and unconcerned about taking risks to find the end results will<br />

often thrive, but failure to recruit appropriate personnel may lead to<br />

lowered morale and high levels of middle management turnover.<br />

Therefore it is seen that there is no place for the individual if they do not<br />

‘fit’ the organisation.<br />

1a.2) The Role Culture<br />

Handy depicts the role culture as a Greek temple, the<br />

personification of a classic bureaucracy which acquires its strength<br />

through functions, specialities, rules and procedures. These speciality<br />

functions can be thought of as a number of pillars which are co-ordinated<br />

and controlled by a small number of senior executives, e.g. represented<br />

by the roof above the pillars (Brown, 1998). Handy described this culture

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!