20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80<br />

1b.1) Critique of the Learning Organisation Concept<br />

There are a number of concerning aspects of the learning<br />

organisation concept. For example, Garvin (1993) argues that there are<br />

three critical features of the concept which need resolution in order to<br />

ensure fully effective implementation within an organisation aspiring to<br />

‘learning’ status. Firstly, as with many constructs and structures within<br />

organisational/business psychology, settling on a fixed definition of what a<br />

learning organisation is done so with difficulty (Wilson & O’Conner, 2000).<br />

Despite this, it is the employees within the workplace who are the main<br />

theme in many accepted definitions. The development of these members<br />

is given the highest priority in a learning organisation, and should<br />

therefore form a key aspect of any definition (Desta, 2009). Secondly,<br />

Davis and Daley argue that, as of 2008, while there are a large number of<br />

studies relating to organisational learning, and in particular why learning<br />

matters, few provide empirical evidence and/or advice as to how to turn<br />

make a ‘learning organisation’. There is therefore little empirical evidence<br />

as to how a hierarchical organisation for example can become a learning<br />

organisation. Finally, it is very difficult to empirically measure (and<br />

therefore evaluate) whether an organisation is ‘learning’, or whether<br />

becoming a learning organisation has improved upon organisational<br />

performance. Studies tend not to address the impact of the various<br />

elements of the learning organisation, nor do they assess the overall<br />

impact of the approach (Davis & Daley, 2008). Finally Harrison (2000)<br />

argues that simply having a number of individuals learning within an<br />

organisation does not necessarily equate to a learning organisation.<br />

Instead, adequate systems and processes are required in order to turn this<br />

individual learning into organisational learning.<br />

Among the advantages of being a ‘learning organisation’, its<br />

proponents suggest that it should enhance individual, team, and<br />

organisational learning which, in turn, yield performance improvements<br />

(David & Daley, 2008). For example in a case study noted by Wilson and<br />

O’Connor (2000), described as the ‘Stumbling Stone’ project, the main<br />

goal was to improve effectiveness by involving workers in a quality

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!