20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

163<br />

again to Jermaine <strong>Ravalier</strong> at <strong>Anglia</strong> <strong>Ruskin</strong> University. Weekly prompts were sent via email to individuals and the<br />

collector again closed after 4 weeks. Data were analysed via simple content analytical techniques using NVivo 8<br />

qualitative data management software, and again results brought forward into the individual interview research<br />

phase.<br />

The next phase of the research process involved one-to-one semi-structured interviews with employees. Due<br />

to the anonymity of the entire research process to this point, and therefore the uncertainty as to who had or had<br />

not taken part in the process, all individuals in the department were invited to take part in the interview process.<br />

Again individuals were invited via two methods: email and hard copy. An invitation letter was sent in a similar<br />

manner to the previous two invitations, and employees were asked to contact Jermaine <strong>Ravalier</strong> on his <strong>Anglia</strong><br />

<strong>Ruskin</strong> University email address, or via telephone. Blocks of time were booked in private meeting rooms at the<br />

council over four half-days. Each interview was designed to last approximately 30 minutes (in order to ensure too<br />

much time is not taken from individuals’ working time), with an extra 10 minutes built into the end of each<br />

interview to ensure participants did not ‘run in’ to each other and henceforth maintain anonymity. The interview<br />

schedule (see Appendix 7) was designed to ensure that participants understand the role that their responses will<br />

play in the study. The questioning schedule was designed to ensure that the positivity principle of AI was<br />

maintained while also eliciting as much helpful information as possible during the context of the discussions.<br />

Individuals were also offered the chance to re-read their own interview transcripts and analysis of these transcripts<br />

in order to ensure validity within the process. Prior to any questions being asked of interviewees participants were<br />

asked to read a participant information sheet (see Appendix 8) as well as a consent sheet (Appendix 9) which

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!