20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

83<br />

world as systematic and HSM evolved as a means of defining a solution to<br />

a problem, and implicit in hard systems thinking is the demand for<br />

quantification and optimisation (Petkov et al., 2008). However, the hard<br />

systems approach is too rigid for exploring the complex area of human<br />

sciences, and therefore a Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) could be<br />

applied to many situations.<br />

Soft systems thinking evolved from HSM and systems engineering<br />

and whereas hard systems thinking assumes the view that technicallybased<br />

problems can be solved in a systematic and functionalist manner,<br />

SSM explores many options and issues and how they interconnect. The<br />

assumptions made by SSM are therefore very different to HSM because it<br />

views the world as complex and the process of investigation is considered<br />

itself as a learning system.<br />

Soft systems models of change (SSMC) have been used in both<br />

public and private sector management to deal effectively with the<br />

problems of organisational improvement and change. Peter Checkland<br />

and colleagues are often accredited with the introduction of SSMC, and<br />

has employed soft systems methodologies in a variety of settings within<br />

the NHS. SSMC was formulated as a way to structure problem-solving and<br />

decision-making under the vagueness of complex human systems. A<br />

human system is identified as a collection of activities in which people are<br />

purposefully engaged as well as the relationships between these activities<br />

(Presley & Meade, 2002). As such, in contrast to HSMC, the world is taken<br />

to be complex, messy and with diverse perspectives (Petkov et al., 2008)<br />

and where there may be several different assessments of a problem. Soft<br />

systems thinking is also categorised as an interpretive systems approach<br />

and the primary areas of concern in this approach are perceptions, values,<br />

beliefs and interests. SSMs therefore emphasise each individual's<br />

perception of reality and therefore works with these to understand<br />

individual beliefs, values, perceptions and interests (Petkov et al., 2008).<br />

Soft systems methodological approaches adopt principles which are<br />

often divergent from those inherent in Hard Systems Models. Hard<br />

systems maintain that the world can be fully and objectively modelled and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!