20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

79<br />

buried but learned from, with the organisation realising that some of<br />

the costs of failure can be recouped simply by learning from it.<br />

2. Learning organisations target areas which require improvement, and<br />

use lessons and knowledge obtained throughout the organisation to<br />

improve upon these areas. Therefore formal interactions between<br />

staff, role rotation and multifunctional teams can help improve the<br />

organisation.<br />

3. Learning organisations understand that those at the front line,<br />

rather than management and others who are removed from the<br />

problems, often know more about activities and processes and how<br />

they can be improved. Therefore it is these individuals who can be<br />

learned from when change is necessary, and ‘mobilising the<br />

knowledge’ of these individuals is a crucial element of the learning<br />

organisation. Knowledge sharing is done so via an ‘open door’<br />

management structure, allowing information to flow upwards easily.<br />

4. Learning organisations are constantly seeking methods to change<br />

and improve, thereby not resting on its laurels. In other words there<br />

is always room for improvement, even in an area thought to be<br />

already efficient. New technologies, personnel or practices can all<br />

allow the evaluation of systems and redesign of parts of the<br />

organisation.<br />

5. Learning organisations learn from a number of sources, including<br />

those outside of the organisation it's self. They learn from<br />

competitors, suppliers and customers in order to improve the<br />

working of the business.<br />

The learning organisation is therefore the opposite of the atypical<br />

hierarchical organisation and encourages employees and management<br />

alike to have open and encouraging communications. Indeed, Lampel<br />

(1998) goes on to argue that the typical hierarchy of organisations of old<br />

is replaced by collaboration and participative working.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!