20.01.2015 Views

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

Ravalier PhD Theis.pdf - Anglia Ruskin Research Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

334<br />

would not be possible, potential participants may have been mistrustful due to the information coming from<br />

management rather than an external independent body, and far too much information was given at the beginning<br />

of the process.<br />

Finally the financial climate was a clear potential negative of taking part in the original AR study. First of all it<br />

was believed that an applied piece of research which assess ‘daily hassles’ would be unlikely to be a dent on the<br />

more acute major event stressors which may go along with the financial issues of working in a public-sector<br />

organisation. Similarly the AR process was not completely anonymous in nature (although confidentiality was<br />

assured). Therefore respondents felt that should they take part they may be putting their jobs at risk by speaking<br />

out (in a negative manner as would be the case with much of the AR process, which looks at the problems rather<br />

than positives within an organisation) against organisational and management systems.<br />

Lessons were learnt therefore from each of the reflections of the AR process. When describing the new<br />

proposal to participants, the explanations were made step-by-step rather than all at once. For example, the survey<br />

was presented and distributed to potential participants before the participants were introduced to the daily log<br />

phase. Also all information and invitations to take part were made by the lead researcher, rather than any<br />

management within the organisation. The whole process was also designed so that less time was required from<br />

participants. For example only two questionnaires were included as part of the overall survey rather than three,<br />

the daily log phase was designed to take just a few minutes at the end of each work day, the semi-structured<br />

interviews were designed to take on average 30 minutes, and each individual was invited to take part in just one<br />

focus group (rather than one focus group per month as in the AR process), both of which were limited to just one<br />

and a half hours long each. Also the whole of the process (as far as was possible) was made completely

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!