cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

Table 2.7Teams going through changeTeam type Group Work Parallel Project MatrixPropensity to Dependent Limited Limited in terms Potentially high Fair giveninitiate on nature and of organizational depending on propensity tochange composition impact integration into address changeof grouporganizationPropensity to Dependent on Dependent on Dependent on Theoretically high. Dependent onadapt to purpose and team members purpose and team Good for limited degree ofchange composition and team culture members changes in scope enabling orof group but not total disabling structureAdvantages Difficult to Good at Good for pilot Good focus for specific Flexible, so goodduring get alignment implementation schemes implementation goals for initiating ideaschangeonce it is clearDisadvantages Useful for Does not like Can become alienated Not good for Leadershipduring coming up change too often through failure, or tackling complex sometimes notchange with out-of- through boasting topics such as clear, so discussionthe-box ideas about success values or leadership can go on for ever93Advice for Good for Need to involve Useful for starting Good for short-range Good forleaders initiating ideas the leaders or things up and tasks such as appointing initiating ideasand spreading shapers of these proving an idea. consultants or researching and spreadingthe word teams early – Do not let members techniques. Not good for the wordespecially if you become too isolated. the complex stuff. Do notneed their Encourage them to be tempted to givecommitment link in with the complex issues likerather than outside world ‘improve communication’complianceto a project team