11.07.2015 Views

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Team <strong>change</strong>usually some highly individualistic or minority member <strong>of</strong> the group, <strong>and</strong> thentreat this person as some kind <strong>of</strong> scapegoat. They all become very concernedwith remaining part <strong>of</strong> the group, greatly fearing exclusion. They show strongtendencies to conform to rapidly established group norms <strong>and</strong> suppress theirindividual differences, perhaps they are afraid <strong>of</strong> becoming the scapegoat… theone thing they hardly do at all is to examine the behaviour they are indulgingin, the task they have actually been given.The situation described in the box <strong>of</strong>fers a way <strong>of</strong> exploring some <strong>of</strong> theunconscious group processes that are at work just below the surface.These are not always visible in more conventional team situations. Thework <strong>of</strong> Bion (1961) <strong>and</strong> Scott Peck (1990) is useful to illuminate thephases that groups go through <strong>and</strong> highlight the challenges for leaders.Moving through dependencyIn any team formation the first thing people look for is someone to tellthem what to do. This is a perfectly natural phenomenon, given thatmany people will want to get on with the task <strong>and</strong> many people willbelieve someone else knows what the task is <strong>and</strong> how it should be done.In any unfamiliar situation or environment people can become dependent.Jon Stokes (in Obholzer <strong>and</strong> Roberts, 1994) describes what Bionobserved in his experience with groups <strong>and</strong> called basic group assumptions:a group dominated by basic assumption <strong>of</strong> dependency behaves as if itsprimary task is solely to provide for the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the needs <strong>and</strong> wishes<strong>of</strong> its members. The leader is expected to look after, protect <strong>and</strong> sustain themembers <strong>of</strong> the group, to make them feel good, <strong>and</strong> not to face them withthe dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the group’s real purpose.The job <strong>of</strong> the leader, <strong>and</strong> indeed the group, is not only to establish leadershipcredibility <strong>and</strong> accountability but to establish its limits. This willimbue the rest <strong>of</strong> the team with sufficient power for them to accomplishtheir tasks. The leader can do this by modelling the taking <strong>of</strong> individualresponsibility <strong>and</strong> empowering others to do the same, <strong>and</strong> by ensuringthat people are oriented in the right direction <strong>and</strong> have a common underst<strong>and</strong>ing<strong>of</strong> team purpose <strong>and</strong> objectives.83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!