11.07.2015 Views

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The right way to manage <strong>change</strong>?Therefore the <strong>management</strong> should be willing <strong>and</strong> flexible to adapt even thetarget definitions, made in the earlier stage <strong>of</strong> the <strong>change</strong> process, if <strong>change</strong>dboundary conditions require this step.Sirken, Keenan <strong>and</strong> Jackson (2005) highlighted four key factorssurrounding the preparation <strong>and</strong> general readiness <strong>of</strong> the organizationwith respect to a <strong>change</strong> initiative. Since the original research, the BostonConsulting group have used these successfully to predict outcomes inmore than 1,000 <strong>change</strong> initiatives across the globe. The four factors are:• duration: ‘a long project that is reviewed frequently is more likely to succeedthan a short project that isn’t reviewed frequently’;• integrity: ‘the extent to which companies can rely on teams <strong>of</strong> managers,supervisors, <strong>and</strong> staff to execute <strong>change</strong> projects successfully’. Thiscomprises the mix <strong>of</strong> knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> experience needed ingetting <strong>change</strong>s done on time, to budget <strong>and</strong> the required quality;• commitment: the demonstrable willingness <strong>of</strong> top <strong>management</strong>, the<strong>change</strong> team <strong>and</strong> the recipients <strong>of</strong> <strong>change</strong> to be engaged in the <strong>change</strong>;• effort: the effort that is required ‘over <strong>and</strong> above the usual work that the<strong>change</strong> initiative dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> people’. This includes:– sponsors <strong>and</strong> senior <strong>management</strong> who may have multiple timepressures <strong>and</strong> the next <strong>change</strong> initiative to concern them;– the <strong>change</strong> team itself, who may be focusing purely on the projectimplementation date rather than the ‘aftershock’ <strong>of</strong> the <strong>change</strong>;– line managers, who <strong>of</strong>ten have the job <strong>of</strong> juggling ‘business asusual’ as well as implementing the <strong>change</strong>s in their areas <strong>and</strong>managing staff through the transition;– employees involved in implementing <strong>change</strong>, who may needadditional resources to do this, for example by a reduction innormal workload, backfilling or <strong>management</strong> recognition thatthere will be a performance dip.Balogun <strong>and</strong> Hope Hailey (2004) approach <strong>change</strong> by asking some veryclear questions about the <strong>change</strong> itself <strong>and</strong> about what ‘levers’ need to bepulled to implement successful <strong>change</strong>.They then go on to look at some <strong>of</strong> the different things you need toconsider when planning <strong>and</strong> managing <strong>change</strong>, what they call the designchoices (Table 10.4).341

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!