11.07.2015 Views

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The right way to manage <strong>change</strong>?100 per cent <strong>of</strong> participants highlighted it as essential for any organization tobuild <strong>and</strong> support an organizational culture <strong>and</strong> structure that facilitatecontinuous <strong>management</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>change</strong> <strong>and</strong> a high level <strong>of</strong> readiness, or ability,to implement <strong>change</strong> as <strong>and</strong> when required.Todnem (2007)Interestingly, Todnem also looked at whether people subscribed to theplanned or the emergent approach to <strong>change</strong>. A majority <strong>of</strong> respondentssuggested a mixed approach which led to the view that perhaps aconscious approach to building <strong>change</strong> readiness as part <strong>of</strong> the organizationalculture would lead to a greater probability <strong>of</strong> success, whether it beplanned or emergent.Roberto <strong>and</strong> Levesque (2005) suggest you need to plan for <strong>change</strong> longbefore the <strong>change</strong> is going to take place:... the seed <strong>of</strong> effective <strong>change</strong> must be planted by embedding procedural<strong>and</strong> behavioural <strong>change</strong>s in an organization long before the initiative islaunched… [T]o achieve effective institutionalization, core process <strong>and</strong>enabling conditions must be embedded into the organization well before the<strong>change</strong> initiative is rolled out… [T]o embed <strong>change</strong> in an organization,managers have to create the conditions that enable employees to takeownership <strong>of</strong> the new procedures <strong>and</strong> systems <strong>and</strong> integrate <strong>and</strong> apply thekey principles <strong>of</strong> the initiative to the way day-to-day work is done.They suggest the four ‘antecedent processes’ <strong>of</strong> chartering, learning,mobilizing <strong>and</strong> realigning, which contribute towards this enabling environmentin which <strong>change</strong> can then occur (see Table 10.2).Pfeifer <strong>and</strong> Schmitt (2005) suggested that <strong>change</strong> success is <strong>of</strong>tenthwarted by a lack <strong>of</strong> readiness:...the <strong>management</strong> barrier reflects the problem that the focus <strong>of</strong> <strong>management</strong>activities is dealing with daily business, not discussing new strategies.The vision barrier arises when visions <strong>and</strong> strategies are not communicatedto employees in a comprehensible way... strategic objectives are not brokendown by means <strong>of</strong> target definitions on the employee level, with the resultthat participation <strong>of</strong> those affected is not achieved. The resource barriermeans that resources are not purposefully deployed for the implementation<strong>of</strong> the strategy. In strategic <strong>change</strong>, the endeavour to secure acceptance <strong>of</strong><strong>change</strong>s by all employees as a whole usually fails (the people barrier).339

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!