11.07.2015 Views

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Emerging inquiriesOnce the seeming opposites are seen as a continuum, the polarizationsets in. For instance, one director that we work with sees ‘team working’as the polar opposite <strong>of</strong> ‘independent working’. This creates stagnation inhis thinking. However, when the continuum is translated into a graph,the possibility that both <strong>of</strong> these may coexist, or that both contain both‘good’ <strong>and</strong> ‘bad’ elements begins to be visible. See Figure 9.2.Either/or thinkingTeam working= goodIndependentworking = badPolarity thinkingTeam workingIndependent workingFigure 9.2Moving from ‘either/or’ thinking to embrace‘polarity’ thinkingPolarities are sets <strong>of</strong> opposites which cannot function well independently.The two sides <strong>of</strong> a polarity are interdependent, so one side cannot be‘right’ or the ‘solution’ at the expense <strong>of</strong> the other. It seems that many <strong>of</strong>the current challenges within organizations are about managing polaritiesor paradoxes, rather than solving problems. So for example, the argumentabout whether top-down or bottom-up <strong>change</strong> works best impliesthat one is right, <strong>and</strong> one is wrong. If these are seen as polarities that needto co-exist <strong>and</strong> both have their good points <strong>and</strong> bad points, it is possibleto reframe the issues that might bring organizational stagnancy bycreating positive new realities.320

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!