11.07.2015 Views

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Team <strong>change</strong>Team rolesThe best way for a team to achieve its goals is for the team to be structuredlogically around those goals. Individual team members need to have clearroles <strong>and</strong> accountabilities. They need to have a clear underst<strong>and</strong>ing notonly <strong>of</strong> what their individual role is, but also what the roles <strong>and</strong> accountabilities<strong>of</strong> other team members are.When <strong>change</strong> happens – within, to or by the team – clarity around rolehas two useful functions. It provides a clear <strong>sense</strong> <strong>of</strong> purpose <strong>and</strong> it providesa supportive framework for task accomplishment. However, during <strong>change</strong>the situation becomes more fluid. Too much rigidity results in tasks fallingdown the gaps between roles, or overlaps going unnoticed. It might resultin team members being less innovative or proactive or courageous.Team operating processesA team needs to have certain enabling processes in place for people tocarry out their work together. Certain things need to be in place that willallow the task to be achieved in a way that is as efficient <strong>and</strong> as effectiveas possible. Glaser <strong>and</strong> Glaser (1992) comment, ‘both participation in all <strong>of</strong>the processes <strong>of</strong> the work group <strong>and</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> a collaborativeapproach are at the heart <strong>of</strong> effective group work. Because <strong>of</strong> the tradition<strong>of</strong> autocratic leadership, neither participation nor collaboration arenatural or automatic processes. Both require some learning <strong>and</strong> practice.’Typical areas that a team need actively to address by discussing <strong>and</strong>agreeing include:• frequency, timing <strong>and</strong> agenda <strong>of</strong> meetings;• problem-solving <strong>and</strong> decision-<strong>making</strong> methodologies;• groundrules;• procedures for dealing with conflict when it occurs;• reward mechanisms for individuals contributing to team goals;• type <strong>and</strong> style <strong>of</strong> review process.In the turbulence created by <strong>change</strong> all these areas will come under additionalstress <strong>and</strong> strain, hence the need for processes to have beendiscussed <strong>and</strong> agreed at an earlier stage. During times <strong>of</strong> <strong>change</strong> when75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!