11.07.2015 Views

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2.4Key attributes in the stages <strong>of</strong> team development79Tuckman Forming Storming Norming Performing(1965) Attempt at establishing Arising <strong>and</strong> dealing <strong>of</strong> Settling down <strong>of</strong> team Team is now ready <strong>and</strong>primary purpose, structure, conflicts surrounding key dynamic <strong>and</strong> stepping enabled to focus primarilyroles, leader, task <strong>and</strong> questions from forming into team norms <strong>and</strong> on its task while attendingprocess relationships, <strong>and</strong> stage agreed ways <strong>of</strong> working to individual <strong>and</strong> teamboundaries <strong>of</strong> the teammaintenance needsSchutz In or out Top or bottom Near or far(1982) Members decide whether they are Focus on who has power <strong>and</strong> Finding levels <strong>of</strong> commitment <strong>and</strong>part <strong>of</strong> the team or not authority within the team engagement within their rolesModlin Structuralism Unrest Change Integration<strong>and</strong> Faris Attempt to recreate Attempt to resolve power Roles emerge based on Team purpose <strong>and</strong> structure(1956) previous power within <strong>and</strong> interpersonal issues task <strong>and</strong> people needs emerge <strong>and</strong> accepted,new team structures Sense <strong>of</strong> team emerges action towards team goalsWhittaker Preaffiliation Power <strong>and</strong> control Intimacy Differentiation(1970) Sense <strong>of</strong> unease, unsure <strong>of</strong> Focus on who has power Team begins to commit to Ability to be clear aboutteam engagement, which is <strong>and</strong> authority within the task <strong>and</strong> engage with one individual roles <strong>and</strong>superficial team another interactions becomeAttempt to define rolesworkmanlikeHill <strong>and</strong> Orientation Exploration ProductionGruner Structure sought Exploration around team roles <strong>and</strong> Clarity <strong>of</strong> team roles <strong>and</strong> team(1973) relations cohesionBion Dependency Fight or flight Pairing(1961) Team members invest the leaders Team members challenge the leaders Team members form pairings in anwith all the power <strong>and</strong> authority or other members attempt to resolve their anxietiesTeam members withdrawScott Peck Pseudocommunity Chaos Emptiness Community(1990) Members try to fake Attempt to establish Giving up <strong>of</strong> expectations, Acceptance <strong>of</strong> each otherteamliness pecking order <strong>and</strong> team assumptions <strong>and</strong> hope <strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> focus on the tasknormsachieving anything

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!