11.07.2015 Views

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The underpinning theory• Individuals <strong>and</strong> groups need to be psychologically aware <strong>of</strong> the needfor <strong>change</strong> in order to adapt.• The response to a <strong>change</strong> in the environment can be designed <strong>and</strong>worked towards.• Participation <strong>and</strong> psychological support are necessary strategies forsuccess.What are the limitations <strong>of</strong> this metaphor? The idea <strong>of</strong> the organization asan adaptive system is flawed. The organization is not really just an adaptiveunit, at the mercy <strong>of</strong> its environment. It can in reality shape the environmentby collaborating with communities or with other organizations,or by initiating a new product or service that may <strong>change</strong> the environmentin a significant way. In addition the idealized view <strong>of</strong> coherence <strong>and</strong>flow between functions <strong>and</strong> departments is <strong>of</strong>ten unrealistic. Sometimesdifferent parts <strong>of</strong> the organization run independently, <strong>and</strong> do so for goodreason. For example the research department might run in a verydifferent way <strong>and</strong> entirely separately from the production department.The other significant limitation <strong>of</strong> this view is noted by Morgan, <strong>and</strong>concerns the danger that this metaphor becomes an ideology. Theresulting ideology says that individuals should be fully integrated with theorganization. This means that work should be designed so that people canfulfil their personal needs through the organization. This can then becomea philosophical bone <strong>of</strong> contention between ‘believers’ (<strong>of</strong>ten, but notalways the HR Department) <strong>and</strong> ‘non-believers’ (<strong>of</strong>ten, but not always, thebusiness directors). See Burns <strong>and</strong> Stalker’s book The Management <strong>of</strong>Innovation (1961) for the original thinking behind this metaphor.Organizations as flux <strong>and</strong> transformationViewing organizations as flux <strong>and</strong> transformation takes us into areas suchas complexity, chaos <strong>and</strong> paradox. This view <strong>of</strong> organizational life sees theorganization as part <strong>of</strong> the environment, rather than as distinct from it. Soinstead <strong>of</strong> viewing the organization as a separate system that adapts tothe environment, this metaphor allows us to look at organizations assimply part <strong>of</strong> the ebb <strong>and</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> the whole environment, with acapacity to self-organize, <strong>change</strong> <strong>and</strong> self-renew in line with a desire tohave a certain identity.104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!