11.07.2015 Views

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Emerging inquiriesWheatley urges leaders to lead through vision, values <strong>and</strong> ethics. This doesnot mean crafting a single vision which shines so brightly that it has its ownpower, but co-creating a vision that permeates the organization <strong>and</strong>harnesses the organization’s own self-organizing power. However, thedifficulty for many leaders is that vision <strong>and</strong> value seem ‘a bit s<strong>of</strong>t’ whencompared to traditional forms <strong>of</strong> authority, <strong>and</strong> they may feel powerless<strong>and</strong> somehow naked without the familiar controlling mechanisms.Wheatley also emphasizes the importance <strong>of</strong> developing a new relationshipwith information so that it is embraced for all its vibrant, livingqualities. She notices an unhelpful habit in leaders. Rather than lookingfor small differences in the information we receive, <strong>of</strong>ten leaders seekcertainty <strong>and</strong> notice only the big trends <strong>and</strong> large gaps. They may valuequick, surface decisions over wiser, deeper ones. She says that leadersneed to see information as nourishment rather than power, <strong>and</strong> keep theflow well stocked.Wheatley goes on to say that in this world <strong>of</strong> chaos <strong>and</strong> complexity weappear to need leaders rather than bosses; people who assist theiremployees in embodying organizational values <strong>and</strong> carry a strong <strong>sense</strong><strong>of</strong> purpose. Policies <strong>and</strong> procedures curtail creativity <strong>and</strong> end up failingto control as effectively as a strong <strong>sense</strong> <strong>of</strong> purpose <strong>and</strong> some clear,hard rules.Scharmer (2000) is a great believer in self-organization too, but he alsosees a more spiritual dimension to organizational or community endeavours.As we <strong>sense</strong> <strong>and</strong> intuit together, something sacred happens, <strong>and</strong> out<strong>of</strong> the space between us something new emerges.Scharmer refers to leadership as ‘sensing <strong>and</strong> actualizing emergingfutures’. He identifies two important methods <strong>of</strong> learning that are bothimportant for sustained organizational success. The first is to reflect onthe past in a way that loosens our traditional views <strong>of</strong> what’s happened.The second is to begin to <strong>sense</strong> <strong>and</strong> embody the emergent future, as itappears out <strong>of</strong> the mist between us, instead <strong>of</strong> re-enacting past patterns.He talks about the processes <strong>of</strong> both ‘letting go’ <strong>and</strong> ‘letting come’,which leaders need to underst<strong>and</strong> as the root <strong>of</strong> generative learning.This process is not about being polite, or getting involved in conflictualdebate or dialectic. It involves true generative <strong>and</strong> reflective dialogue.Scharmer sees the leader’s role as creating the conditions that allowothers to ‘shift the place from which their system operates’. There is asacred quality to Scharmer’s work which takes us far beyond the focus328

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!