11.07.2015 Views

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IT-based process <strong>change</strong>decision-<strong>making</strong> process in an organization. They become mere ‘implementers’<strong>of</strong> other people’s solutions. IT <strong>management</strong> skills need to bepresent not only within IT departments, but all over the organization.IT people need to learn more about organizational <strong>change</strong> processes. ITpeople have been traditionally uninterested in anything except technology,which has led to a division between designing the IT system (IT’sresponsibility) <strong>and</strong> realizing the benefits by getting people to use it well(business managers’ responsibility). This is changing, but not fast enough.IT people now need to shift their competency from being technicalexperts, to being specialists with <strong>change</strong> <strong>management</strong> skills.Human-oriented processes for implementing IT systems work betterthan processes that have a purely technical focus, <strong>and</strong> incremental process<strong>change</strong> has a better record <strong>of</strong> success than radical process <strong>change</strong>.Excitement about ‘radical’ process <strong>change</strong> has led to a belief that onlyradical <strong>change</strong>s bring radical results. BPR (business process re-engineering)has not brought all the hoped-for benefits, because <strong>of</strong> its lack <strong>of</strong>focus on people <strong>and</strong> the inherently risky nature <strong>of</strong> radical process transformation.It is highly probable that incremental, more human-oriented solutionssuch as those based on socio-technical design actually work better.If a <strong>change</strong> in information-sharing habits is required, this meansaddressing the <strong>change</strong> as you would a cultural <strong>change</strong>. Problems comewhen senior managers <strong>and</strong> IT people believe that technology will automatically<strong>change</strong> behaviour. Often the reverse happens: the new technologyreinforces the habits <strong>and</strong> attitudes already present. A culture <strong>change</strong> maybe required to create the shifts in information sharing required, because theintroduction <strong>of</strong> new IT systems alone will not achieve this.Chief executives have started to over-value the power <strong>of</strong> IT, beyond thestrategic gains it can really <strong>of</strong>fer. IT is not now a scarce resource, but a fact<strong>of</strong> life. Some say that IT’s importance has diminished, <strong>and</strong> that organizationsneed to approach IT investment <strong>and</strong> <strong>management</strong> in a verydifferent way, allowing others to experiment with new systems beforedeciding to buy, <strong>and</strong> only investing where there is vulnerability.307

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!