11.07.2015 Views

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

cameron and green making-sense-of-change-management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Clarity <strong>and</strong> impact <strong>of</strong> core values <strong>and</strong> direction setting on service deliveryEveryone had accepted the council’s core values, but that was perhapsbecause they were commonsensical <strong>and</strong> there was nothing in them thatanyone could contest. However there was scope for them to be revisited,made more specifically dem<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> directed towards action in orderto realize their potential. There were too many values, <strong>and</strong> these wereneither meaningfully translated into ways <strong>of</strong> working nor explicitly linkedto preferred outcomes or any performance <strong>management</strong> system. They hadbeen launched with a fanfare some time before, <strong>and</strong> no investment hadbeen put into their continued dissemination <strong>and</strong> implementation.Everyone in the council had a mix <strong>of</strong> agendas to work to: variouscorporate policy priorities, service delivery priorities, inter-agencyworking <strong>and</strong> development initiatives. Greater clarity was neededthroughout the council about what outcomes were being sought <strong>and</strong> howthey could come together at every level. All managers <strong>and</strong> service headsfelt the tension <strong>of</strong> multiple dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> needed an effective process forbalancing these dem<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> setting personal <strong>and</strong> team targets.The corporate policy priorities had a tremendously varied degree <strong>of</strong>ownership, due partly to the lack <strong>of</strong> clarity around what they actuallymeant, <strong>and</strong> also to a suspicion whether the political leadership <strong>and</strong> corporatemanagerial leadership were really committed to driving themthrough. They did not translate easily into a vision for a better city thatemployees could rally behind, <strong>and</strong> therefore the result was confusion <strong>and</strong>a growing cynicism, rather than commitment.There was little evidence that people were rewarded or recognized formoving the corporate agenda on, <strong>and</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> ongoing budget provisionfor these corporate initiatives also indicated a hesitancy when it cameto putting money where the mouth was.A visible <strong>and</strong> congruent leadership <strong>and</strong> <strong>management</strong> styleCultural <strong>change</strong>At all levels, but notably at middle <strong>and</strong> front line, there were requests forclearer, bolder <strong>and</strong> consistent leadership. This was seen as particularlybeing the challenge for political leaders <strong>and</strong> senior <strong>of</strong>ficers in managingthe council’s myriad conflicting dem<strong>and</strong>s.Clarity <strong>of</strong> vision <strong>and</strong> articulation <strong>of</strong> the council’s true direction <strong>and</strong> theway it was to be achieved were needed to minimize confusion <strong>and</strong> focuspeople’s minds <strong>and</strong> resources.265

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!