03.06.2013 Views

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tion of National Min<strong>or</strong>ities". Is it possible that confirmation of such significant<br />

in<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mation was not sent to the Council of Europe within the<br />

period of three years? 228<br />

As <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the "<strong>European</strong> <strong>Charter</strong> <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>or</strong> Min<strong>or</strong>ity Languages":<br />

On the basis of general provisions indicated in the ECRML and<br />

"by taking into account the democratic principles, a member state of the<br />

Council of Europe is entitled to define itself the criteria that will serve<br />

to assign the relevant status of every single language spread over the territ<strong>or</strong>y<br />

of a given country (articles 30-36 of the <strong>Charter</strong>’s Explanat<strong>or</strong>y<br />

Rep<strong>or</strong>t).<br />

Acc<strong>or</strong>ding to 2008 data, twenty-three out of <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ty-eight member<br />

states of the Council of Europe have ratified the "<strong>European</strong> <strong>Charter</strong> <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong><br />

<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>or</strong> Min<strong>or</strong>ity Languages" (Armenia, Germany, Finland, Roma-<br />

229 230<br />

nia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, UK, Poland ) ; ten states have only<br />

signed the document (Azerbaijan, France, Italy, Russia); as <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the other<br />

fifteen states, they have not yet <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mulated their position (Ge<strong>or</strong>gia, Turkey,<br />

Greece, Lithuania, Estonia, Belgium, Latvia, P<strong>or</strong>tugal…) 231<br />

.<br />

Despite a one-year obligation assumed in 1999, the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian<br />

government failed to ratify the "<strong>European</strong> <strong>Charter</strong> <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>or</strong> Min<strong>or</strong>ity<br />

Languages" during ten years; consequently, Ge<strong>or</strong>gia received<br />

several reprimands from the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of<br />

228 Naturally, negligence by the officials of the Council of Europe is not ruled out: in the<br />

materials of the Council of Europe, namely, documents on ratification of ECRML by<br />

Austria and Armenia, we have traced other technical err<strong>or</strong>s that were c<strong>or</strong>rected after the<br />

letter by T. Putkaradze had been sent to the ECRML secretariat (namely, to Ms. Sonia<br />

Parayre); cf. in<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mation published on January 9, 2009 (Status as of: 9/1/2009) and that<br />

of uploaded since January 13:<br />

(http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/Commun/ListeDeclarations.asp?NT=148&CM=&DF=<br />

&CL=ENG&VL=1.<br />

229 In 2005 Polish Seim adopted the Law on National and Ethnic Min<strong>or</strong>ities and a <strong>Regional</strong><br />

Language; acc<strong>or</strong>ding to the very law, in fact, the regional language is regarded to<br />

be another state language in the region where the national <strong>or</strong> ethnic min<strong>or</strong>ity resides.<br />

http://www.usefoundation.<strong>or</strong>g/view/479.<br />

230 F<strong>or</strong> instance, in Germany the following languages are regarded to be such: Danish<br />

(in Schleswig-Holstein), Upper S<strong>or</strong>bian (in the Free State of Saxony), Lower S<strong>or</strong>bian<br />

(in Brandenburg), N<strong>or</strong>th Frisian (in Schleswig-Holstein), Saterland Frisian (in Lower<br />

Saxony), Romani (across Germany) and Low German (in Bremen, Hamburg, Mecklenburg-Western<br />

Pomerania, Lower Saxony, and Schleswig-Holstein).<br />

231 http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=148&CM=&DF=&CL=ENG<br />

198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!