03.06.2013 Views

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1. Chechen; 2. Tsova-Tush; 3. Khunzakh; 4. Udi; 5. Azeri; 6.<br />

Armenian; 7. Laz <strong>or</strong> Chan; 8. Megrelian; 9. Abkhazian; 10. Svan; 11.<br />

Ossetian 236<br />

.<br />

Based on such qualifications, a certain part of <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>eign <strong>or</strong> Ge<strong>or</strong>gian<br />

specialists believe that, in acc<strong>or</strong>dance with recommendations of the<br />

Council of Europe, the following twelve languages must enjoy the status<br />

of min<strong>or</strong>ity <strong>or</strong> regional languages spread in Ge<strong>or</strong>gia: Russian, Armenian,<br />

Azeri… Megrelian, Svan.<br />

Cf., the <strong>Charter</strong> aims at protection of native languages of autoch-<br />

237<br />

thonous ethnic min<strong>or</strong>ities . We would like to emphasize that Megrelian,<br />

Laz and Svan are domestic idioms rather than ethnic min<strong>or</strong>ity languages<br />

in Ge<strong>or</strong>gia.<br />

Sadly, even the experts of the Council of Europe make a mistake<br />

claiming that Ge<strong>or</strong>gian, Megrelian, Laz and Svan are languages of independent<br />

ethnoses <strong>or</strong> sub-ethnoses; in their opinion, existence of these<br />

"languages" justifies that fact that the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian nation fails to consolidate.<br />

F<strong>or</strong> instance, acc<strong>or</strong>ding to the rep<strong>or</strong>t of the independent international<br />

fact-finding mission designed by the <strong>European</strong> Union (headed by<br />

Heidi Tagliavini, a Swiss diplomat), lack of consolidation of the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian<br />

nation is, apart from other reasons, supposedly determined by existence<br />

of Megrelian, Laz and Svan "languages" that differ from the<br />

238<br />

Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language .<br />

236<br />

http://vlib.iue.it/hist<strong>or</strong>y/asia/ge<strong>or</strong>gia.html.<br />

237 F<strong>or</strong> the hist<strong>or</strong>y of the issue see T. Putkaradze. “<strong>European</strong> <strong>Charter</strong> <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>or</strong><br />

Min<strong>or</strong>ity Languages” and the issue of linguistic policy planning in Ge<strong>or</strong>gia, Caucasiological<br />

Series, V, Tbilisi, 2009; http://www.scribd.com/doc/12621676/T-Putkaradze-<br />

<strong>European</strong>-<strong>Charter</strong>-<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>-<strong>Regional</strong>-<strong>or</strong>-Min<strong>or</strong>ity-Languages-and-An-Issue-of-Plannig-<br />

Linguistic-Policy-in-Ge<strong>or</strong>gia<br />

238 http://www.ceiig.ch/Rep<strong>or</strong>t.html (volume II, p. 2). Hist<strong>or</strong>y of an Ambivalent Relationship:<br />

"Ge<strong>or</strong>gian national identity claims hist<strong>or</strong>ical <strong>or</strong>igins dating as far back as the<br />

establishment of an autocephalous Ge<strong>or</strong>gian church in the 4th century and the emergence<br />

of the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language with its own alphabet in the 5th century. Nevertheless,<br />

<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> centuries Ge<strong>or</strong>gia was divided into diverse local sub-ethnic entities, each with its<br />

own characteristic traditions, manners, dialects and, in the case of the Mingrelians, Lazs<br />

and Svans, with separate languages similar to Ge<strong>or</strong>gian. The process of ethnic consolidation<br />

and nation-making had not been completed (A standard w<strong>or</strong>k on this process is:<br />

Ronald Grig<strong>or</strong> Suny, The Making of the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian Nation, Bloomington/Indianapolis,<br />

1994). Earlier Ge<strong>or</strong>gian hist<strong>or</strong>y culminated in the united Ge<strong>or</strong>gian Kingdom of the 11 th<br />

to 13 th centuries, when Ge<strong>or</strong>gia was a regional power in the Caucasus. In ensuing peri-<br />

201

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!