03.06.2013 Views

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

are branches of the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language, rather that separate languages,<br />

the very idea has been and is still claimed by the enemies of our country".<br />

However, not during the Tsarism period but in the soviet empire<br />

the The<strong>or</strong>y of Kartvelian "languages" indeed became widespread. A<br />

large part of the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian scientists had to take into consideration the<br />

"only" acceptable view claimed by Stalin. In the repressive regime the<br />

resistance <strong>or</strong> proving a differing opinion equaled the suicide. At last under<br />

the influence of the Soviet tradition, some considered the Ge<strong>or</strong>gians<br />

of Lazeti-Samegrelo and Svaneti – one of the most principal creat<strong>or</strong>s of<br />

the centuries-old Ge<strong>or</strong>gian literary culture – to be the tribes without<br />

their own written language and literary culture who write in the language<br />

of their related people (the Ge<strong>or</strong>gians). Thought such unjustifiable<br />

conclusion had previously been fiercely debated; discussions by Iv.<br />

Javakhishvili, N. Marr, A. Shanidze and S. Khundadze are of special<br />

interest (see Hist<strong>or</strong>y of the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language, 2006, pp. 37-39).<br />

All academic attempts of reconstructing proto-Kartvelian and the<br />

hist<strong>or</strong>y of Ge<strong>or</strong>gian literary language proves that the phonematic, nominal,<br />

verbal, syntactic and lexical-semantic structures are in general<br />

identical with the common Kartvelian language (<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the materials see,<br />

2.2); as <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the domestic dialects of the Ge<strong>or</strong>gians, they are m<strong>or</strong>e <strong>or</strong> less<br />

varied variants of this the<strong>or</strong>etically rest<strong>or</strong>ed common language. Acc<strong>or</strong>dingly,<br />

it s logical to consider the current varieties <strong>or</strong>iginating from the<br />

proto-language as dialects in terms of c<strong>or</strong>relation between them and the<br />

common national hist<strong>or</strong>ical language 286<br />

.<br />

Modern Kartvelian dialects could be grouped in different ways;<br />

<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> instance, three maj<strong>or</strong> groups are identified under the centerperiphery<br />

principle, while two groups are identified under the hist<strong>or</strong>ical<br />

reflexes of consonants:<br />

I. the center-periphery principle, in the first place, considers<br />

similarity-difference between the phonematic, m<strong>or</strong>phological, syntactic<br />

286 Cf.: Dialect is a Greek w<strong>or</strong>d that means a branch of a nationwide language, a local<br />

speech which is spoken by a part of a given nation (ethnicity).<br />

239

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!