03.06.2013 Views

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In fact, Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language is a hist<strong>or</strong>ical native language (National language)<br />

<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> Svans as well as Megrels; Ge<strong>or</strong>gian literary language being a<br />

national creation of the Ge<strong>or</strong>gians is believed to unify the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian nation<br />

in the course of the centuries, and Megrelian-Laz-Svan idioms are<br />

regarded to be the secondary varieties of the common Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language<br />

– a native language. Cf. those who claim that the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language<br />

is not a native language <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> Megrels deprive this group of Ge<strong>or</strong>gians<br />

of great literary culture created by the Chkondideli, Minchkhi,<br />

Merchule and Rustaveli.<br />

The need <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> ratification of the "<strong>European</strong> <strong>Charter</strong> <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>or</strong><br />

Min<strong>or</strong>ity Languages" contributes to the urgency of the qualification issue<br />

<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> the Kartvelian idioms. Given our reality the issue is also complicated<br />

by the fact that there is no consensus on criteria that allow description<br />

of the linguistic situation in Ge<strong>or</strong>gia.<br />

Naturally, it is problematic to separate Kartvelian idioms into<br />

languages and dialects as the politicized provisions of the Soviet era are<br />

quite deeply rooted in public consciousness. We as linguists cannot<br />

take com<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>t in the fact that qualification of idioms goes beyond the<br />

scope of linguistics; cf., <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> instance, G. Laionz: "difference between the<br />

closely related languages and dialects is m<strong>or</strong>e political and cultural, rather<br />

than linguistic"; B. J<strong>or</strong>benadze (1889, pp. 118-119): the process of differentiation<br />

into languages and dialects do involve political and cultural aspects…<br />

"A dialect, a language, a language branch, a language family are relative<br />

terms".<br />

At present it takes a lot of w<strong>or</strong>k to provide objective in<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mation<br />

regarding the hist<strong>or</strong>y and present of the language of the Ge<strong>or</strong>gians to the<br />

international community that has been largely misin<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>med by the Russian<br />

empire.<br />

ods it split up into several political entities such as the kingdom of Kartli and Kakheti in<br />

the east and the kingdom of Imereti and principalities like Samegrelo and Svaneti in the<br />

west. Ge<strong>or</strong>gia weakened after repeated attacks by <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>eign powers like the Mongols and<br />

Timurides. From the 16 th century onward, Ottoman Turkey and Safavid Iran began to<br />

subjugate western and eastern regions of Ge<strong>or</strong>gia respectively".<br />

F<strong>or</strong> criticism see: http://www.scribd.com/doc/21919401/T-Putkaradze-Taliavni-<br />

Komisiis-Daskvnis-Kidev-Erti-Rusuli-Pasaji;<br />

http://pirweli.com.ge/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=36778&Itemid=1.<br />

202

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!