03.06.2013 Views

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pluperfect<br />

a) while <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ming Pluperfect of the transitive verbs the literary<br />

Ge<strong>or</strong>gian employs a stem of dynamic verb of Series 2. F<strong>or</strong>mation template<br />

<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> all verbs is the same: the <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>m is based on the A<strong>or</strong>ist stem of<br />

the relevant verb and by its <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>m represents A<strong>or</strong>ist of the relevant passive<br />

with e-. Thematic markers include: -i, -e and 0.<br />

Sh<strong>or</strong>t <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms of Pluperfect occur in Old Ge<strong>or</strong>gian: ağmešena,<br />

dameţeva, ganmeaħla, momemzada, medida…<br />

In modern literary language they are combined with the -eb-in-a<br />

ending: amešenebina, dameţovebina, medidebina… Archaic <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mation<br />

is preserved in Phovian dialects.<br />

In Megrelian and Chan Pluperfect employs the same stem as Perfect,<br />

though adds the suffix –d of Imperfect to it: mizim-u(n) >mizim-ud-u…<br />

(Arn. Chikobava, 1936, pp. 145-147; I. Kipshidze, 1914, pp. 086-088)<br />

(cf.: bipersonal intransitive verbs of literary Ge<strong>or</strong>gian: momsvlia –<br />

momsvloda, mkonia – mkonoda…).<br />

Chan examples: mitkvapuţu "I had said", duķidapuţes "they had<br />

built", gunċķimuţu "s/he had opened", ubirapuţu "s/he had sung" (G. Kartozia,<br />

2005, pp. 100-101).<br />

In Vitsean-Arkabean Pluperfect is sometimes complicated by d<strong>or</strong>en/ren<br />

"is" auxiliary verb: muħţimuţu-d<strong>or</strong>en "s/he had come",<br />

ugnapuţes-ren "they had heard", etc. (G. Kartozia, 2005, p. 101).<br />

Also, in Svan the Pluperfect <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>m mainly differs from Perfect by<br />

only the screeve marker. The Pluperfect <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mants are as follows: Balszemoan:<br />

ǟn, Balskvemoan (Etser.) än, Lentekhian: an, Lashkh: ān/ēn.<br />

Balszemoan: mimār–ǟn "I had prepared", jimār-ǟn, ħomār-ǟn, miħţauǟn,<br />

"I had painted", jiħţaw-ǟn, ħoħţaw-ǟn...<br />

b) Pluperfect of bipersonal intransitive verbs hist<strong>or</strong>ically<br />

represents Perfect which expresses imperfective aspect; it includes suffix<br />

–od.<br />

General structure of Pluperfect <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms is as follows: preverb +<br />

personal marker + stem +thematic marker + od extention + screeve<br />

marker: da-v-h-viċq-eb-od-e, da-h-viċq-eb-od-a…<br />

The screeve marker -i occurs instead of -e in modern literary<br />

Ge<strong>or</strong>gian: da-v-viċq-eb-od-i, da-viċq-eb-od-i, da-viċq-eb-od-a…<br />

279

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!