03.06.2013 Views

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mon Kartvelian phenomenon, rather than the specificity of certain dialect<br />

<strong>or</strong> dialectal group; cf.:<br />

It is assumed that na- prefix <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms in Western dialects of the<br />

Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language are established by influence of Megrelian (Arn. Chikobava,<br />

1936, p. 146). If the view is shared, no>na process can be difficult<br />

to justify. Acc<strong>or</strong>ding to the well-known rules of sound c<strong>or</strong>respondence<br />

the opposite na>no process is much m<strong>or</strong>e logical. It could be assumed<br />

that the <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms with Megrelian prefix no- have developed after<br />

separation of Megrelian and Chan.<br />

The<strong>or</strong>etically it is quite probable that the template with Megrelian<br />

prefix no- served as a basis <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> Imeretian-Lechkhumian-Rachan <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms<br />

with prefix na- (in this case, <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mation employing prefix na- must be<br />

considered as semantically calqued from <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms with Megrelian prefix<br />

no-), though at the same time the issue of interrelationship of Svan Resultative<br />

IV and Megrelian Resultative III emerges. By assuming chronological<br />

prevalence of Megrelian, the Svan lŭ- seems to be a phonetic<br />

variant of the Megrelian prefix no-. We believe that Svan lŭ- <strong>or</strong>iginates<br />

from prefix la- which seems to be an equivalent of the common Kartvelian<br />

na-/sa.<br />

Acknowledging the <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms of the so-called Series 4 as common<br />

Kartvelian is not opposed by the fact that the <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms of similar <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mation<br />

are not attested in literary Gergian and eastern dialects. Similar meaning<br />

is conveyed by Perfect screeve, which, acc<strong>or</strong>ding to context, has the<br />

same meaning as Megrelian-Chan-Imeretian-Svan Present Perfects.<br />

The modern Kartvelian sub-systems could be divided into two<br />

groups acc<strong>or</strong>ding to the <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms of Present Perfect: a) Kartvelian dialects<br />

of Western Ge<strong>or</strong>gia (Megrelian, Imeretian, Lechkhumia, Rachan, Chan,<br />

Svan) which use a different template to denote the meaning of Present<br />

Perfect, b) literary Ge<strong>or</strong>gian and Eastern Ge<strong>or</strong>gian dialects which have<br />

no special <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>m <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> Present Perfect, instead they use Perfect screeve.<br />

1.2.4. Syntax<br />

The modifier-modified relationship in Kartvelian sub-systems<br />

is substantially homogeneous.<br />

In Archaic Ge<strong>or</strong>gian the attributive modifier agreed with the<br />

modified in number. In modern literary language the modified is agreed<br />

285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!