03.06.2013 Views

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The template <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> a screeve considered to be the Resultative IV by<br />

the specialists is as follows: lŭ-ma + Present stem + un-e, <strong>or</strong>: lŭ + ma<br />

+ (Present stem) e + auxiliary verb. Prefixes are always attested, as<br />

opposed to suffixes.<br />

Balszemoan: lŭmgämǖn ħwi Lentekhian: lŭmägem ħwi našenebvar<br />

lŭmgämǖn ħi lŭmägem ħi našenebħar<br />

lŭmgämǖn li lŭmägem li našeneba<br />

(V. Topuria, 1967, p. 134).<br />

V. Topuria: prefix lŭ- might be lŭ- of the past participle. It is<br />

w<strong>or</strong>th mentioning that in Svan dialects it is the prefix lŭ- that is the<br />

main <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mant of past participle, <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> instance: lŭ-g-e "built", lu-kwit "stolen",<br />

lŭ-m-e "eaten", lŭ-b-e "tied", etc. (V.Topuria, 1979, pp. 218-219).<br />

Prefix na- in past tense <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms is relatively rare. It could explain the use<br />

of lŭ- prefix, instead of na- in Resultative IV.<br />

Resultative IV of the Svan dialects could c<strong>or</strong>respond to the <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms<br />

with prefix na- attested in Megrelian-Imeretian-Lechkhumian-Rachan<br />

in terms of structure.<br />

In Svan Resultative III and Resultative differ also in terms of<br />

construction IV: the <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mer is relative, while the latter is absolute.<br />

There are no <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms of Series 4 attested in Chan (though past<br />

event prefix no- is used). Two <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms of Chan Perfect are known in special<br />

literature: Perfect derived from Imperfect, Perfect derived from<br />

A<strong>or</strong>ist. The meaning of Present Perfect is rendered by the Perfect derived<br />

from imperfect which is of analytical <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mation: imperfect <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>m<br />

+ d<strong>or</strong>en (Vitsean-Arkabean) //ere (Atinan, Khopan) auxiliary verb:<br />

Vitsean-Arkabean Khopan<br />

b-zum-um-ţ-i-d<strong>or</strong>en b-zim-up-ţ-e-r-e "I apparently measured"<br />

zum-um-ţ-i-d<strong>or</strong>en zim-up-ţ-e-r-e "you apparently measured"<br />

zum-um-ţ-u-d<strong>or</strong>en zim-up-ţ-e-r-e-n "s/he apparently measured"<br />

(Arn. Chikobava, 1936, p. 141).<br />

(A<strong>or</strong>ist derived Resultative: b-zum-i-d<strong>or</strong>en/b-zim-ere "I apparently had measured")<br />

In terms of function the Chan imperfect derived Perfect is the<br />

same as the Megrelian-Imeretian-Svan Perfects, and in terms of composition,<br />

it is similar to the Svan Resultative III.<br />

There<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>e, the specific <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>mation of Present Perfect is characteristic<br />

not only to the Megrelian-Imeretian-... dialects but also to the Chan<br />

and Svan dialects; the <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ms of so-called Series 4 seems to be the com-<br />

284

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!