03.06.2013 Views

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

"evropuli qartia saqarTvelo "European Charter for Regional or ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tection <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong> hist<strong>or</strong>ical min<strong>or</strong>ities – must be applied to the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language<br />

(and its varieties) in the Republic of Turkey.<br />

In addition, it is well documented that the autochthonous Ge<strong>or</strong>gians<br />

(the Ingilos) reside in three regions of Azerbaijan; there<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>e the<br />

Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language in this country must be covered by Part III of the<br />

<strong>Charter</strong>.<br />

The Ge<strong>or</strong>gians also compactly live in Iran.<br />

Iran is not a member country of the Council of Europe though we<br />

would like to mention the issue of the language of the Ge<strong>or</strong>gians residing<br />

in this country: found centuries ago the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian were <strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>cedly exiled<br />

to Iran by the officials of Persian empire; there<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>e, the current auth<strong>or</strong>ities<br />

in Iran have higher motivation toprotect the native culture and<br />

linguistic rights of the Fereydanian Ge<strong>or</strong>gians. Today, the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian<br />

language is not suppressed in Iran though, as far as we know, the state<br />

fails to exercise care to protect it.<br />

In Russia, the US, Greece and other countries the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian language<br />

represents a language of diasp<strong>or</strong>as <strong>or</strong> migrants; linguistic rights<br />

of migrants are protected by legislation of all countries though it is the<br />

Ge<strong>or</strong>gian state that must offer supp<strong>or</strong>t to the Ge<strong>or</strong>gian migrants and representatives<br />

of diasp<strong>or</strong>a in protecting their identity.<br />

In connection with the above mentioned, one of the "recommendations"<br />

by T. Wicherkiewicz and his Ge<strong>or</strong>gian colleagues, namely, the<br />

paragraph on page 38 suggests:<br />

"Special imp<strong>or</strong>tance must be attributed to the sociolinguistic research<br />

on the Laz and the Megrels residing on the territ<strong>or</strong>y of Turkey<br />

and Abkhazia respectively. Linguistic situation in the above mentioned<br />

areas is to be clarified and defined. Best ef<strong>f<strong>or</strong></strong>ts are required to maintain<br />

and develop linguistic and cultural heritage and self-perception 442<br />

of our<br />

brothers who are beyond the jurisdiction of Ge<strong>or</strong>gia".<br />

The auth<strong>or</strong>s of the above recommendation would rather recall<br />

other autochthonous Ge<strong>or</strong>gians in Turkey such as: the Machakhelians,<br />

the Livanans, the Imerkhevians and the Taoans, etc. There are extensive<br />

research materials on the linguistic-cultural "self-perception" of autochthonous<br />

Ge<strong>or</strong>gians who hold Turkish citizenship. It would be better to<br />

442 The term such as “identity” <strong>or</strong> “uniqueness” would be better to use in this context.<br />

344

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!