TQM Model of Elements-Deployment Table Developed from Quality ...
TQM Model of Elements-Deployment Table Developed from Quality ...
TQM Model of Elements-Deployment Table Developed from Quality ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The result <strong>of</strong> <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Elements</strong> <strong>Deployment</strong> <strong>Table</strong> (synthesis) restructered again by<br />
using the data <strong>of</strong> <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Award Element Comparison Matrix was inserted into<br />
<strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Award Element Comparison Matrix made in step 6 and step 7, and the<br />
array <strong>of</strong> the <strong>TQM</strong> element was rearranged. A part <strong>of</strong> the above-mentioned result is<br />
shown in the <strong>Table</strong> 4.13. This <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Award Eelement Comparison Matrix is a<br />
table <strong>of</strong> vertical table side <strong>of</strong> left 180 ✕ holizontal tableside on top 46. Various analyses<br />
are possible in the future by the application <strong>of</strong> the multivariate analysis technique by<br />
using this. The <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Award Element Comparison Matrix when the first <strong>TQM</strong><br />
<strong>Elements</strong> <strong>Deployment</strong> <strong>Table</strong> is consolidated in the item is shown as an appendix. The<br />
first element <strong>of</strong> each Award can be read though the matrix is transposed for the<br />
convenience <strong>of</strong> the display.<br />
According to the above-mentioned step, each table in each step is made as follows.<br />
(1) Criteria Element <strong>Deployment</strong> <strong>Table</strong> according to each <strong>Quality</strong> Award<br />
(2) <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Elements</strong> <strong>Deployment</strong> <strong>Table</strong> according to each <strong>Quality</strong> Award<br />
(3) <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Elements</strong> <strong>Deployment</strong> <strong>Table</strong> (synthesis)<br />
(4) <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Award Element Comparison Matrix (individual)<br />
(5) <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Award Element Comparison Matrix (synthesis)<br />
The common standard (It was said the anchor) and quantitative data for the<br />
comparison was prepared for scientific analysis while the past analysis research were<br />
just mutual qualitative comparisons based on arrangement <strong>of</strong> mere criteria item and<br />
evaluation point to different category. These steps can be applied more widely as a<br />
methodology <strong>of</strong> the comparison research.<br />
4.4.3 Comparison <strong>of</strong> Each Award by <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Award Element Comparison Matrix<br />
(synthesis)<br />
(A) Comparison by consolidating table <strong>of</strong> <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Award Element Comparison<br />
Matrix (synthesis)<br />
As shown in <strong>Table</strong> 4.1, small table that <strong>TQM</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Award Element Comparison<br />
Matrix summarizated among 1st level <strong>of</strong> <strong>TQM</strong> Element <strong>of</strong> vertical column <strong>of</strong> left line and<br />
holizontal column <strong>of</strong> top row summarized each award unit is shown. The calculation <strong>of</strong><br />
consolidating only summarized up the Relationship Index <strong>of</strong> each Award in cell that<br />
corresponded.<br />
Which <strong>TQM</strong> Element understands whether is valued according to <strong>Quality</strong> Award if<br />
<strong>Table</strong> 4.15 is looked vertically (line) according to the Award. Moreover, which <strong>Quality</strong><br />
Award understands whether is valued relatively if it is looled holizontally (row)<br />
according to <strong>TQM</strong> Elemen vertically (line). (This is explained in etail later at (C)).<br />
That is, even if Relation Index <strong>of</strong> each Award are holizontally compared and the<br />
133