TQM Model of Elements-Deployment Table Developed from Quality ...

Comparison Item
satisfaction and enjoy for Co-existence and Co-prosperity through TQM.
There is a big difference with the KEIRETSU concept that is rather apt to
fall into disadvantage that this respect falls easily as exclusiveness or
coercion (Kuno and Yamada [31]).
Table 2.16 Comparison between KEIRETSU and GWQM
KEIRETSU
Vertical Horizontal
Parent and child Parts processing and Techincal tie-up.
relation
production of final Joint development.
Or
product.
Ordering of parts of
Relativity relation. Offering investment product.
and capital.
Establishment of
Furnishing Techincal joint venture
guidance.
company.
Despatching
director.
of
Situation It is always done. Each time when
necessary.
Style Relation that is ruled
the small and
medium-sized
enterprise
enterprise.
by big
Merit Cheaper cost.
Absorption
technology.
of New
Steady relationship.
49
It is not clearly to
rule or not to rule.
Technology
improvement and
complement by
tie-up.
Shared Scale merit.
GWQM
Quality Assurance for CS.
QM guidance and education
and training in enterprise.
QM Diagnosis and Enterprise
Evaluation system.
XX Company Quality Award.
QM Conference, QC Circle
Convention and Exchange
meeting of the entire group.
It is always routinized.
Equal level between
purchaser and seller
(Vendee-Vender) relation.
Brother enterprise.
Sharing of common business
philosophy
thinking.
and way of
Improvement
Assurance.
Cost reduction.
of Quality
Improvement
constitution.
of company
That is, GWQM is processing on for customer satisfaction under common
objectives by enterprise group with TQM and where each company TQM that
are mutually collaborating and supporting under equal and same level
situations. GWQM is organizing to follow for ”Win-Win” concept each other in
business relationship, utilizing “Design-to-Cost” concept for new product