TQM Model of Elements-Deployment Table Developed from Quality ...

and individual visited to JUSE from abroad were, as shown in Table 3.1, their visits to
JUSE were rapidly increased by group and individual from various countries in 1980s,
and it was observed the peak for visit in 1990, then gradually decreased after 1995. The
country of each visitor were reached 115 countries (59.9% of the world of 192 countries)
during such period. The country disoatched to Japan more than 100 times or more were
counted as 466 from USA, 153 from Brazil, 108 from Mexico of American Continent, and
169 from France, and 111 from United Kingdom of Europe, and 307 from South Korea,
139 from China, 128 from Taiwan, 127 from India of Asia. These survey tour would be
contributed not only for motive and information on introduction of the MBNQA in
U.S.A., EQA in Europe and other quality awards in each country, but for TQM
implementation.
No. of
Table 3.1 JUSE Visit Situation from each country
Group &
No. of
Annual countries individual total people Annual countries individual total people
1979 13 33 255 1991 44 136 1167
1980 25 78 375 1992 48 150 1044
1981 28 134 648 1993 40 87 760
1982 48 163 932 1994 38 72 576
1983 48 154 932 1995 42 68 1204
1984 46 176 980 1996 57 48 863
1985 50 169 1246 1997 70 29 730
1986 49 147 847 1998 62 38 482
1987 46 159 787 1999 49 38 293
1988 46 183 1216 2000 18 16 356
1989 35 160 1250 2001 40 20 290
1990 38 127 1468
Remarks
62
No. of
Group &
No. of
Asia: 35 and South and North America: 22 and Oceania: 4 and Europe: 28 and Africa:
26 and 115 in total countries
3.1.2 Propagation of Quality Awards to each Country
As for quality award concern, they were classified into two kinds of issues by
Government issues and Piblic issues. According to the papers of Jonson [2], Hromi [3],
and Data published by Japan Business Management Quality Council, as shown Table
3.2, 18 countries of 65 countries (including EQA) are issued their criteria for awarding
as of 2003 information, it could be established as such, but it were not available at the
time of studying. Figure 3.1 is showing a route of the Quality Award propagation in the
world-wide level. It could be assumed that USA would be recognized for value and