08.06.2013 Views

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9. Combination of Solutions<br />

Substituting the results for Σ −1<br />

i<br />

<br />

we obtain<br />

A ⊤ 1 P 1A1 + A ⊤ 2 P 2A2<br />

<br />

p c =<br />

A ⊤ 1 P 1 y 1 + A ⊤ 2 P 2 y 2<br />

<br />

(9.12)<br />

which is identical to Eqn. (9.4). This simple superposition of normal equations, also called<br />

stacking of normal equations, is always possible if the individual observation series are<br />

independent (indicated by a dispersion matrix in the form of Eqn. (9.2)).<br />

Let us emphasize that this condition is not fulfilled in the case of the superposition of doubledifference<br />

solutions based on different clusters of baselines. If the clusters are connected by<br />

baselines (and only in this case stacking of the solutions yields an advantage due to common<br />

parameters), non-zero elements in the off-diagonal parts of the weight matrix P p originating<br />

from mathematical correlations in the double-difference mode are neglected. Clusters of<br />

baselines have, therefore, to be selected carefully in order to minimize the effect of this<br />

small incorrectness. In the same way clusters of stations in a zero-difference analysis are not<br />

independent if satellite clocks or other common parameters are estimated.<br />

9.2.3 Computation of the Combined RMS<br />

In the previous section we only considered the combined parameter estimation. Sequential<br />

LSE leads to identical results for the a posteriori estimate of the variance of unit weight:<br />

Ωc =<br />

m<br />

y<br />

i=1<br />

⊤ m<br />

iP i yi − y<br />

i=1<br />

⊤ iP iAip c<br />

σ 2 c = 1<br />

<br />

m<br />

y<br />

fc i=1<br />

⊤ m<br />

iP i yi − y<br />

i=1<br />

⊤ <br />

iP iAip c<br />

(9.13)<br />

(9.14)<br />

Where fc is the degree of freedom of the combined solution. The importance of the “third<br />

normal equation part” y ⊤ P y (see Eqn. (7.12)) is clearly seen in this formula. We refer to<br />

[Brockmann, 1997] for a complete discussion.<br />

9.3 Manipulation of Normal Equations<br />

Normal equations can be manipulated in a number of different ways. The keywords are:<br />

normal equation rescaling, expansion of normal equations, transformation of parameters or<br />

of a priori parameter information, stacking of parameters, reduction of number of parameters<br />

and introduction of additional parameters, parameter constraining, and parameter preelimination.<br />

These manipulations are described in more detail in the following sections.<br />

9.3.1 Changing Auxiliary Parameter Information<br />

Parameters are always accompanied by auxiliary information such as, e.g., station name,<br />

as well as epoch or time interval of validity. Changing of auxiliary parameter information<br />

is a very simple operation which does not have any influence on the system of normal<br />

equations. It includes renaming of stations and changing receiver and antenna names. In<br />

Page 186 AIUB

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!