08.06.2013 Views

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11.4 Troposphere Modeling in the <strong>Bernese</strong> <strong>GPS</strong> <strong>Software</strong><br />

As we saw in the previous section an a priori model requires some input parameters (pressure,<br />

temperature, and humidity). These values are usually derived from a standard model<br />

atmosphere. You may alternatively introduce measured meteo values for some (or all) stations<br />

(option “Meteorological data” in <strong>GPS</strong>EST). The corresponding file description may be<br />

found in Sections 11.5.2 and 22. For stations without explicitly introduced values, the standard<br />

model is used automatically. Programs CODSPP and MAUPRP always use a standard<br />

atmosphere model.<br />

Usually the tropospheric refraction is not taken into account by an a priori model alone,<br />

but always together with estimating additional parameters. Although it is possible to use<br />

only an a priori model it is by no means recommended if high accuracy is aimed for.<br />

Let us clarify this statement by having a look at the implications of small biases in ground<br />

meteorological data (pressure, temperature, humidity) on the estimated station heights.<br />

Table 11.2, together with Eqn. (11.1), gives an impression of the sensitivity of the estimated<br />

station height (independent of the baseline length) on biases in surface meteorological<br />

measurements for different atmospheric conditions. We see, e.g., that in a hot and<br />

humid environment (last line in Table 11.2) an error of only 1% in the relative humidity will<br />

induce a bias of 4 mm in the tropospheric zenith delay, which will in turn produce (using<br />

Eqn. (11.1)) a height bias of more than one centimeter! It is common knowledge that it is<br />

virtually impossible to measure the relative humidity to that accuracy (let alone using a<br />

standard atmosphere model); moreover the measured humidity is usually not representative<br />

for the entire environment of a site. This is why experience tells that estimation of troposphere<br />

parameters is a necessity if high accuracy is required and if only ground met data are<br />

available. Similar remarks are true for temperature measurements. It should be possible,<br />

on the other hand, to measure surface pressure to the accuracy level necessary (0.1 mm) to<br />

render pressure-induced height errors harmless. You should always keep in mind the orders<br />

of magnitude reflected in Table 11.2 when using ground meteorological data. Our conclusion<br />

is, that only if you are able to provide meteorological values stemming from Water Vapor<br />

Radiometers you have a chance to get around the estimation of tropospheric zenith delays.<br />

There is one exception to that rule: if you are working in a rapid static mode with short<br />

observation times (less than 1 hour), you may be best advised not to estimate troposphere<br />

parameters but to use only an a priori model together with the standard atmosphere.<br />

Table 11.2: Tropospheric zenith delay as a function of temperature T, pressure P, and<br />

relative humidity H.<br />

T P H<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

∂∆̺<br />

∂T ∂∆̺<br />

∂P ∂∆̺<br />

oC mbar % mm/ oC mm/mbar<br />

∂H<br />

mm/%<br />

0o 1000 50 3 2 0.6<br />

30o 1000 50 14 2 4<br />

0o 1000 100 5 2 0.6<br />

30o 1000 100 27 2 4<br />

<strong>Bernese</strong> <strong>GPS</strong> <strong>Software</strong> <strong>Version</strong> <strong>5.0</strong> Page 245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!