08.06.2013 Views

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

Bernese GPS Software Version 5.0 - Bernese GNSS Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16. Antenna Phase Center Offsets and Variations<br />

reference. Only elevation-dependent corrections and no azimuthal dependences have been<br />

taken into account. Antenna radomes have not been considered for most of the antennas.<br />

In addition, the variations of the satellite antenna phase centers have been neglected – only<br />

a constant antenna offset vector from the center of mass of the satellite to the satellite<br />

antenna was considered.<br />

The IGS has switched to an absolute antenna phase center model in <strong>GPS</strong> week 1400 (2006-<br />

Nov-05, day of year 309 – model name: IGSyy wwww, yy denotes the year and wwww the<br />

week of the release, see IGS Mail 5272). It is based on a set of robot-calibrated receiver antenna<br />

phase center variation models that consider also the azimuthal dependence [Wübbena<br />

et al., 2000]. At the same time the satellite antenna phase center variations are considered<br />

in a nadir-dependent model [Schmid and Rothacher, 2003]. These two changes correspond<br />

to each other because the satellite antenna phase center model was determined based on<br />

the absolute receiver antenna phase center model.<br />

In addition, the IGS has started to consider the impact of different antenna radomes. Phase<br />

patterns are either used directly from the robot calibration, or converted from the relative<br />

model, or – if no corrections are available – the model for the antenna type without radome<br />

is used instead.<br />

Recent studies have shown small differences between receiver antenna phase center variations<br />

for GLONASS and <strong>GPS</strong> frequencies. The number of calibrated <strong>GNSS</strong> receiver antennas<br />

with individual <strong>GPS</strong> and GLONASS patterns is currently very limited, however. For that<br />

reason the antenna phase center variations for GLONASS satellites – as included in the<br />

upcoming IGS antenna model – are estimated on the assumption that all receiver antenna<br />

phase patterns for GLONASS frequencies are equal to those of the corresponding <strong>GPS</strong><br />

frequencies. The differences between the <strong>GPS</strong> and GLONASS receiver antenna patterns are<br />

small. Nevertheless, a mean pattern difference may have been mapped into the GLONASS<br />

satellite pattern.<br />

16.2 Antenna Phase Center Corrections in the <strong>Bernese</strong> <strong>GPS</strong> <strong>Software</strong><br />

16.2.1 Mathematical Representation of Antenna Phase Center Corrections<br />

In the <strong>Bernese</strong> <strong>GPS</strong> <strong>Software</strong> we use the following mathematical representation of the<br />

antenna phase center variation correction, that is also illustrated in Figure 16.1:<br />

where<br />

∆φ(α,z) = ∆φ ′ (α,z) + ∆r · e , (16.1)<br />

∆φ(α,z) ... is the total phase center correction in direction α,z ,<br />

α,z ... is the azimuth and the zenith angle of the satellite line of sight,<br />

∆r ... defines the position of the mean antenna phase center with respect to the<br />

mechanically defined antenna reference point. This vector is uniquely defined<br />

by imposing the condition<br />

2π<br />

zmax <br />

α=0 z=0<br />

∆φ(α,z) sin z d z d α = min. (e.g. zmax = 75 o ) .<br />

Page 328 AIUB

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!